Xavier Fritel1, Henri Panjo, Noëlle Varnoux, Virginie Ringa. 1. Poitiers University Hospital, INSERM CIC802, Poitiers, France; INSERM, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, Gender, Sexual and Reproductive Health Team, Univ Paris-Sud, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Institut National des Etudes Démographiques, Paris, France.
Abstract
AIMS: Our main objective was to analyze individual determinants that lead middle-aged women to seek medical care for urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: Observational longitudinal study among GAZEL cohort participants: 2,640 women aged 50-62 completed a self-administered questionnaire at baseline. Eight years later (2008) 2,273 (86%) responded to a follow-up questionnaire. Seeking care for UI was defined as any consultation for UI during the 8-year follow-up period. Individual determinants considered in the regression analysis were social and demographic characteristics, social relations, UI type and severity, and other health factors. RESULTS: Among 1,192 women reporting incontinence at baseline, 24.4% had visited a physician at least once for UI during the follow-up period (56.0% of those reporting severe UI). The care-seeking rate increased with age at baseline. Multivariate analysis showed that women who reported severe UI (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 2.6-6.5), mixed UI (2.0; 1.3-3.0), or neurologic disease (1.6; 1.1-2.6), had weak social support (1.4; 1.0-2.0), or talked about their UI with close friends or family (1.5; 1.0-2.1) were more likely to seek care for UI. A model including these factors had a 78% probability of correctly differentiating women with incontinence who chose to seek care from those who did not. Our analysis could not take factors related to the organization of health services into account. CONCLUSIONS: Women do not always seek care for UI, even when it is severe. Besides UI severity and type, consultation is associated with aging, weak social support, conversation about it with close friends and family, and neurologic disorders.
AIMS: Our main objective was to analyze individual determinants that lead middle-aged women to seek medical care for urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: Observational longitudinal study among GAZEL cohort participants: 2,640 women aged 50-62 completed a self-administered questionnaire at baseline. Eight years later (2008) 2,273 (86%) responded to a follow-up questionnaire. Seeking care for UI was defined as any consultation for UI during the 8-year follow-up period. Individual determinants considered in the regression analysis were social and demographic characteristics, social relations, UI type and severity, and other health factors. RESULTS: Among 1,192 women reporting incontinence at baseline, 24.4% had visited a physician at least once for UI during the follow-up period (56.0% of those reporting severe UI). The care-seeking rate increased with age at baseline. Multivariate analysis showed that women who reported severe UI (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 2.6-6.5), mixed UI (2.0; 1.3-3.0), or neurologic disease (1.6; 1.1-2.6), had weak social support (1.4; 1.0-2.0), or talked about their UI with close friends or family (1.5; 1.0-2.1) were more likely to seek care for UI. A model including these factors had a 78% probability of correctly differentiating women with incontinence who chose to seek care from those who did not. Our analysis could not take factors related to the organization of health services into account. CONCLUSIONS:Women do not always seek care for UI, even when it is severe. Besides UI severity and type, consultation is associated with aging, weak social support, conversation about it with close friends and family, and neurologic disorders.
Authors: Karin S Coyne; Marion Kvasz; Andrea M Ireland; Ian Milsom; Zoe S Kopp; Chris R Chapple Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Kraig S Kinchen; Kathryn Burgio; Ananias C Diokno; Nancy H Fultz; Richard Bump; Robert Obenchain Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Emily S Lukacz; Tamara G Bavendam; Amanda Berry; Cynthia S Fok; Sheila Gahagan; Patricia S Goode; Cecilia T Hardacker; Jeni Hebert-Beirne; Cora E Lewis; Jessica Lewis; Lisa Kane Low; Jerry L Lowder; Mary H Palmer; Ariana L Smith; Sonya S Brady Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Elisabeth Erekson; Kaitlin A Hagan; Andrea Austin; Donald Carmichael; Vatche A Minassian; Francine Grodstein; Julie P W Bynum Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jocelyn Fitzgerald; Christopher Pierce; Joann Nugent; Joan Blomquist; Victoria L Handa Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2016 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Jenna M Norton; Jennifer L Dodson; Diane K Newman; Rebecca G Rogers; Andrea D Fairman; Helen L Coons; Robert A Star; Tamara G Bavendam Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 2.894