Literature DB >> 23817894

Basal ganglia engagement during feedback processing after a substantial delay.

Ekaterina Dobryakova1, Elizabeth Tricomi.   

Abstract

The striatum has been shown to play an important role in learning from performance-related feedback that is presented shortly after each response. However, less is known about the neural mechanisms supporting learning from feedback that is substantially delayed from the original response. Since the consequences of one's actions often do not become known until after a delay, it is important to understand whether delayed feedback can produce neural responses similar to those elicited by immediate-feedback presentation. We investigated this issue by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as participants performed a paired-associate learning task with 180 distinct trials. Feedback indicating response accuracy was presented immediately, after a delay of 25 min, or not at all. Both immediate and delayed feedback led to significant gains in accuracy on a posttest, relative to no feedback. Replicating previous work, we found that the caudate nuclei showed greater activation for positive feedback than for negative feedback when the feedback was presented immediately. In addition, delayed feedback also led to differential caudate activity to positive versus negative feedback. Delayed negative feedback also produced significant activation of the putamen and globus pallidus (the lentiform nucleus), relative to no feedback and delayed positive feedback. This suggests that the caudate nucleus is sensitive to the affective nature of feedback, across different time scales, while the lentiform nucleus may be particularly involved in processing the information carried by negative feedback after a substantial delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23817894      PMCID: PMC3833958          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0182-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  46 in total

1.  Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum.

Authors:  M R Delgado; L E Nystrom; C Fissell; D C Noll; J A Fiez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning.

Authors:  D Shohamy; C E Myers; J Kalanithi; M A Gluck
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Functional significance of striatal responses during episodic decisions: recovery or goal attainment?

Authors:  Sanghoon Han; Scott A Huettel; Ana Raposo; R Alison Adcock; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne N Haber; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Feedback timing modulates brain systems for learning in humans.

Authors:  Karin Foerde; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cooperation between the hippocampus and the striatum during episodic encoding.

Authors:  Talya Sadeh; Daphna Shohamy; Dana Rubi Levy; Niv Reggev; Anat Maril
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The lateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex work as a dynamic integrated system: evidence from FMRI connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Olivia Longe; Carl Senior; Gina Rippon
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour.

Authors:  M F S Rushworth; T E J Behrens; P H Rudebeck; M E Walton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  11 in total

1.  Neural responses to maternal criticism in healthy youth.

Authors:  Kyung Hwa Lee; Greg J Siegle; Ronald E Dahl; Jill M Hooley; Jennifer S Silk
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Modulation of ventral striatal activity by cognitive effort.

Authors:  Ekaterina Dobryakova; Ryan K Jessup; Elizabeth Tricomi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Dorsal striatum mediates deliberate decision making, not late-stage, stimulus-response learning.

Authors:  Nole M Hiebert; Adrian M Owen; Ken N Seergobin; Penny A MacDonald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Contributions of the hippocampus to feedback learning.

Authors:  Kathryn C Dickerson; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Beyond Reward Prediction Errors: Human Striatum Updates Rule Values During Learning.

Authors:  Ian Ballard; Eric M Miller; Steven T Piantadosi; Noah D Goodman; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Goals and task difficulty expectations modulate striatal responses to feedback.

Authors:  Samantha DePasque Swanson; Elizabeth Tricomi
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Cognitive fatigue in individuals with traumatic brain injury is associated with caudate activation.

Authors:  G R Wylie; E Dobryakova; J DeLuca; N Chiaravalloti; K Essad; H Genova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Knowledge acquisition is governed by striatal prediction errors.

Authors:  Alex Pine; Noa Sadeh; Aya Ben-Yakov; Yadin Dudai; Avi Mendelsohn
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Success and failure of controlling the real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback signal are reflected in the striatum.

Authors:  Leon Skottnik; Bettina Sorger; Tabea Kamp; David Linden; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Authors:  Fuhong Li; Jing Wang; Bin Du; Bihua Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.