Literature DB >> 23817889

Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after more than 5 years.

Michele Billia1, Oussama Elhage, Benjamin Challacombe, Declan Cahill, Rick Popert, Kathy Holmes, Roger Sinclair Kirby, Prokar Dasgupta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the last 10 years, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become increasingly popular as witnessed by an increased number of publications. However, there is still little known about the long-term oncologic outcomes of this technique. The aim of this study is to assess the oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent RARP at least 5 years ago, with an emphasis on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2004, RARP was introduced at our institutions. Records of all patients having RARP were prospectively collected in a dedicated database as part of the NUVOLA-BAUS project. For the present study, we selected only patients who had a follow-up of at least 5 years. Endpoints were BCRFS rate and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS).
RESULTS: Overall, we identified 175 patients; 61.7 % of patients had Gleason 7-9 disease and 26.9 % had pT ≥ 3 disease at final pathology. Eight patients (4.5 %) had biochemical recurrence at follow-up. Overall 5-year BCRFS rate was 95.4 %, while it was 97.6, 91 and 50 % in pT2, pT3 and pT4 diseases, respectively. Among the patients who recurred, the mean time to recurrence was 22.1 ± 8.8 months. These patients received salvage external beam radiation treatment combined with hormonal therapy (anti-androgen + LHRH analogue) or hormonal therapy alone. 5-year CSS was 98.3 % (172/175): in 2 cases, the specimen showed pT4 cancer, while lymph node metastasis was noted in one case.
CONCLUSION: The 5-year BCRFS and CSS after RARP are encouraging even in a population with significant high-risk disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23817889     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1120-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Alok Shrivastava; Ashutosh Tewari; Richard Sarle; Ashok Hemal; James O Peabody; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010.

Authors:  Iqbal Singh; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 3.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; Christophe Vaessen; Vincent Hupertan; Eva Comperat; Vincent Misraï; Alain Haertig; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Mark L Gonzalgo; Li-Ming Su; Thomas J Guzzo; George Netto; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Shady Salem; Yakup Kordan; S Duke Herrell; Sam S Chang; Peter E Clark; Rodney Davis; Roxelyn Baumgartner; Sharon Phillips; Michael S Cookson; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Mahendra Bhandari; Nilesh Gupta; Zhaoli Lane; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers; Jesse Sammon; Sameer A Siddiqui; Mireya Diaz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Michael Kerger; Helen Crowe; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Amel Ibrahim; Tim T Wang; Nuzhath Khan; Ben Challacombe; Muhammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Baojun Wang; Qing Ai; Yu Zhang; Xiangjun Lv; Hongzhao Li; Xin Ma; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Tobias Maurer; Thomas Horn; Kathleen Herkommer; Marie Hegemann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hou-Chuan Lai; Meei-Shyuan Lee; Kuen-Tze Lin; Yi-Hsuan Huang; Jen-Yin Chen; Yao-Tsung Lin; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.