Literature DB >> 23817500

The effectiveness of the TAX 327 nomogram in predicting overall survival in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Xiao-Jie Bian1, Yao Zhu, Yi-Jun Shen, Jin-You Wang, Chun-Guang Ma, Hai-Liang Zhang, Bo Dai, Shi-Lin Zhang, Xu-Dong Yao, Ding-Wei Ye.   

Abstract

Based on the results of TAX 327, a nomogram was developed to predict the overall survival of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after first-line chemotherapy. The nomogram, however, has not been validated in an independent dataset, especially in a series out of clinical trials. Thus, the objective of the current study was to validate the TAX 327 nomogram in a community setting in China. A total of 146 patients with mCRPC who received first-line chemotherapy (docetaxel or mitoxantrone) were identified. Because clinical trials are limited in mainland China, those patients did not receive investigational treatment after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. The predicted overall survival rate was calculated from the TAX 327 nomogram. The validity of the model was assessed with discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis. The median survival of the cohort was 21 months (docetaxel) and 19 months (mitoxantrone) at last follow-up. The predictive c-index of the TAX 327 nomogram was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54-0.70). The calibration plot demonstrated that the 2-year survival rate was underestimated by the nomogram. Decision curve analysis showed a net benefit of the nomogram at a threshold probability greater than 30%. In conclusion, the present validation study did not confirm the predictive value of the TAX 327 nomogram in a contemporary community series of men in China, and further studies with a large sample size to develop or validate nomograms for predicting survival and selecting therapies in advanced prostate cancer are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23817500      PMCID: PMC3881657          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2013.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  25 in total

1.  A critical appraisal of logistic regression-based nomograms, artificial neural networks, classification and regression-tree models, look-up tables and risk-group stratification models for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Jochen Walz; Michael W Kattan; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Reduced-dose docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer has no inferior impact on overall survival in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Yuki Kita; Yosuke Shimizu; Takahiro Inoue; Tomomi Kamba; Koji Yoshimura; Osamu Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A contemporary prognostic nomogram for men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: a TAX327 study analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Armstrong; Elizabeth S Garrett-Mayer; Yi-Chun Ou Yang; Ronald de Wit; Ian F Tannock; Mario Eisenberger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration.

Authors:  Oren Smaletz; Howard I Scher; Eric J Small; David A Verbel; Alex McMillan; Kevin Regan; W Kevin Kelly; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Distinct prognostic role of prostate-specific antigen doubling time and velocity at emergence of androgen independence in patients treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Timothy J Daskivich; Meredith M Regan; William K Oh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study.

Authors:  Dominik R Berthold; Gregory R Pond; Freidele Soban; Ronald de Wit; Mario Eisenberger; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer nomograms: a review of their use in cancer detection and treatment.

Authors:  R J Caras; Joseph R Sterbis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Prognostic models for predicting overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Pinart; F Kunath; V Lieb; I Tsaur; B Wullich; Stefanie Schmidt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.