INTRODUCTION: Quality chest compressions (CC) are the most important factor in successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Adjustment of CC based upon an invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP) display would be theoretically beneficial. Additionally, having one compressor present for longer than a 2-min cycle with an ABP display may allow for a learning process to further maximize CC. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that CC can be improved with a real-time display of invasively measured blood pressure and with an unchanged, physically fit compressor. METHODS: A manikin was attached to an ABP display derived from a hemodynamic model responding to parameters of CC rate, depth, and compression-decompression ratio. The area under the blood pressure curve over time (AUC) was used for data analysis. Each participant (N=20) performed 4 CPR sessions: (1) No ABP display, exchange of compressor every 2 min; (2) ABP display, exchange of compressor every 2 min; (3) no ABP display, no exchange of the compressor; (4) ABP display, no exchange of the compressor. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Significance was set at a p-value<0.05. RESULTS: The average AUC for cycles without ABP display was 5201 mm Hgs (95% confidence interval (CI) of 4804-5597 mm Hgs), and for cycles with ABP display 6110 mm Hgs (95% CI of 5715-6507 mm Hgs) (p<0.0001). The average AUC increase with ABP display for each participant was 20.2±17.4% 95 CI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the hypothesis that a real-time display of simulated ABP during CPR that responds to participant performance improves achieved and sustained ABP. However, without any real-time visual feedback, even fit compressors demonstrated degradation of CC quality.
INTRODUCTION: Quality chest compressions (CC) are the most important factor in successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Adjustment of CC based upon an invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP) display would be theoretically beneficial. Additionally, having one compressor present for longer than a 2-min cycle with an ABP display may allow for a learning process to further maximize CC. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that CC can be improved with a real-time display of invasively measured blood pressure and with an unchanged, physically fit compressor. METHODS: A manikin was attached to an ABP display derived from a hemodynamic model responding to parameters of CC rate, depth, and compression-decompression ratio. The area under the blood pressure curve over time (AUC) was used for data analysis. Each participant (N=20) performed 4 CPR sessions: (1) No ABP display, exchange of compressor every 2 min; (2) ABP display, exchange of compressor every 2 min; (3) no ABP display, no exchange of the compressor; (4) ABP display, no exchange of the compressor. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. Significance was set at a p-value<0.05. RESULTS: The average AUC for cycles without ABP display was 5201 mm Hgs (95% confidence interval (CI) of 4804-5597 mm Hgs), and for cycles with ABP display 6110 mm Hgs (95% CI of 5715-6507 mm Hgs) (p<0.0001). The average AUC increase with ABP display for each participant was 20.2±17.4% 95 CI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the hypothesis that a real-time display of simulated ABP during CPR that responds to participant performance improves achieved and sustained ABP. However, without any real-time visual feedback, even fit compressors demonstrated degradation of CC quality.
Authors: Gordon A Ewy; Mathias Zuercher; Ronald W Hilwig; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Charles W Otto; Melinda M Hayes; Karl B Kern Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Catherine H McDonald; James Heggie; Christopher M Jones; Christopher J Thorne; Jonathan Hulme Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Heather Wolfe; Matthew R Maltese; Dana E Niles; Elizabeth Fischman; Veronika Legkobitova; Jessica Leffelman; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert M Sutton Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.454