Literature DB >> 23816393

Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts.

Jeremy M Parker1, Mark W Weller, Linda Maiman Feinstein, Robin J Adams, Michael L Main, Paul A Grayburn, David O Cosgrove, Barry A Goldberg, Kassa Darge, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, Stephanie Wilson, Mark Monaghan, Fabio Piscaglia, Brian Fowlkes, Wilson Mathias, Fuminari Moriyasu, Maria Christina Chammas, Lennard Greenbaum, Steven B Feinstein.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging is a radiation-free diagnostic tool that uses biocompatible ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to improve image clarity. UCAs, which do not contain dye, often salvage "technically difficult" ultrasound scans, increasing the accuracy and reliability of a front-line ultrasound diagnosis, reducing unnecessary downstream testing, lowering overall health care costs, changing therapy, and improving patient care. Two UCAs currently are approved and regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. They have favorable safety profiles and risk/benefit ratios in adult and pediatric populations, including compromised patients with severe cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, these UCAs are contraindicated in patients with known or suspected right-to-left, bidirectional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts. These patients, who constitute 10% to 35% of the general population, typically receive no UCAs when they undergo echocardiography. If their echocardiographic images are suboptimal, they may receive inappropriate diagnosis and treatment, or they may be referred for additional diagnostic testing, including radiation-based procedures that increase their lifetime risk for cancer or procedures that use contrast agents containing dye, which may increase the risk for kidney damage. An exhaustive review of current peer-reviewed research demonstrated no scientific basis for the UCA contraindication in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts. Initial safety concerns were based on limited rodent data and speculation related to macroaggregated albumin microspheres, a radioactive nuclear imaging agent with different physical and chemical properties and no relation to UCAs. Radioactive macroaggregated albumin is not contraindicated in adult or pediatric patients with cardiac shunts and is routinely used in these populations. In conclusion, the International Contrast Ultrasound Society Board recommends removal of the contraindication to further the public interest in safe, reliable, radiation-free diagnostic imaging options for patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts and to reduce their need for unnecessary downstream testing.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816393     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

1.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in the pediatric oncologic population: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jamie L Coleman; Fariba Navid; Wayne L Furman; M Beth McCarville
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography: latest developments and clinical utility.

Authors:  Thomas R Porter; Feng Xie
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Evolving clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  Vasileios Rafailidis; Sasan Partovi; Alexander Dikkes; Dean A Nakamoto; Nami Azar; Daniel Staub
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

4.  Transient intrapulmonary shunting in a patient treated with β₂-adrenergic agonists for status asthmaticus.

Authors:  Melissa L Bates; Joseph E Jacobson; Marlowe W Eldridge
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Enhancing the role of paediatric ultrasound with microbubbles: a review of intravenous applications.

Authors:  Vasileios Rafailidis; Annamaria Deganello; Tom Watson; Paul S Sidhu; Maria E Sellars
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Feasibility of Retrograde Ureteral Contrast Injection to Guide Ultrasonographic Percutaneous Renal Access in the Nondilated Collecting System.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; David T Tzou; John Mongan; Kazumi Taguchi; Stefanie Weinstein; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Feasibility of Antegrade Contrast-enhanced US Nephrostograms to Evaluate Ureteral Patency.

Authors:  Thomas Chi; Manint Usawachintachit; John Mongan; Maureen P Kohi; Andrew Taylor; Priyanka Jha; Helena C Chang; Marshall Stoller; Ruth Goldstein; Stefanie Weinstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Microbubbles in the belly: optimizing the protocol for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pediatric abdomen.

Authors:  Lauramay Davis; Susan J Back
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-25

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: technical and lexicon recommendations from the ACR CEUS LI-RADS working group.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Yuko Kono; Christoph F Dietrich; Hyun-Jung Jang; Tae Kyoung Kim; Fabio Piscaglia; Alexander Vezeridis; Juergen K Willmann; Stephanie R Wilson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

Review 10.  Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound in Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Akbar N Ashrafi; Nima Nassiri; Inderbir S Gill; Mittul Gulati; Daniel Park; Andre L de Castro Abreu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.