Literature DB >> 23816270

Evaluating national practice of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer based on clinical auditing.

N J van Leersum1, H S Snijders, M W J M Wouters, D Henneman, C A M Marijnen, H R Rutten, R A E M Tollenaar, P J Tanis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Internationally, the use of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer varies largely, related to different decision-making based on the harm-benefit ratio. In the Dutch guideline, RT is indicated in all cT2-4 tumours. We aimed to evaluate the use of RT in the Netherlands and to discuss Dutch practice in the context of current literature.
METHODS: Data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) were used and 6784 patients surgically treated for primary rectal cancer in 2009-2011 were included. The application and type of RT were described according to age, comorbidity, tumour localization and tumour stage at population level with analysis of hospital variation for specific subsets.
RESULTS: In total, 85% of patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer received RT. Comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2+) and older age (≥70 years) were associated with a slight decrease in application of RT (75 and 80% respectively). In stage I tumours, 77% of patients received RT, but large hospital variation existed (0-100%). The proportion chemoradiotherapy of the whole group of RT increased with increasing N-stage, increasing T-stage, decreasing distance from the anus, younger age and less comorbidity with hospital variation from 0 to 73%.
CONCLUSION: From a European perspective, a high percentage of rectal cancer patients are treated with RT in the Netherlands. Considerable hospital variation was observed for RT in stage I and the proportion of chemoradiotherapy among all RT schemes. Data from clinical auditing enable evaluation of national practice and current standards from both a scientific and international perspective.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmarking; Clinical audit; Colorectal neoplasms; Colorectal surgery; Guideline adherence; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816270     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  Cancer Center Volume and Type Impact Stage-Specific Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Emily F Midura; Andrew D Jung; Meghan C Daly; Dennis J Hanseman; Bradley R Davis; Shimul A Shah; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a two-centre experience in the era of intensified oncological treatment.

Authors:  Gijsbert D Musters; Didi A M Sloothaak; Sapho Roodbeen; Anna A W van Geloven; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections.

Authors:  Yoen Tk van der Linden; Doeke Boersma; Koop Bosscha; Daniel J Lips; Hubert A Prins
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Low risk of intra-abdominal infections in rectal cancer patients treated with Hartmann's procedure: a report from a national registry.

Authors:  Ingvar Sverrisson; Maziar Nikberg; Abbas Chabok; Kenneth Smedh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Improving quality of care and clinical outcomes for rectal cancer through clinical audits in a multicentre cancer care organisation.

Authors:  M G Torras; E Canals; C Muñoz-Montplet; A Vidal; D Jurado; A Eraso; S Villà; M Caro; J Molero; M Macià; M Puigdemont; E González-Muñoz; A López; F Guedea; J M Borras
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Variation in guideline adherence in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma care: impact of patient and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  Jozette J C Stienen; Rosella P M G Hermens; Lianne Wennekes; Saskia A M van de Schans; Richard W M van der Maazen; Helena M Dekker; Janine Liefers; Johan H J M van Krieken; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service.

Authors:  E J A Morris; P J Finan; K Spencer; I Geh; A Crellin; P Quirke; J D Thomas; S Lawton; R Adams; D Sebag-Montefiore
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Data verification of nationwide clinical quality registries.

Authors:  L R van der Werf; S C Voeten; C M M van Loe; E G Karthaus; M W J M Wouters; H A Prins
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-08-19

9.  Effect of understaging on local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Louis J X Giesen; Wernard A A Borstlap; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis; Cornelis Verhoef; Pim B Olthof
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.885

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.