OBJECTIVES: Internationally, the use of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer varies largely, related to different decision-making based on the harm-benefit ratio. In the Dutch guideline, RT is indicated in all cT2-4 tumours. We aimed to evaluate the use of RT in the Netherlands and to discuss Dutch practice in the context of current literature. METHODS: Data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) were used and 6784 patients surgically treated for primary rectal cancer in 2009-2011 were included. The application and type of RT were described according to age, comorbidity, tumour localization and tumour stage at population level with analysis of hospital variation for specific subsets. RESULTS: In total, 85% of patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer received RT. Comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2+) and older age (≥70 years) were associated with a slight decrease in application of RT (75 and 80% respectively). In stage I tumours, 77% of patients received RT, but large hospital variation existed (0-100%). The proportion chemoradiotherapy of the whole group of RT increased with increasing N-stage, increasing T-stage, decreasing distance from the anus, younger age and less comorbidity with hospital variation from 0 to 73%. CONCLUSION: From a European perspective, a high percentage of rectal cancer patients are treated with RT in the Netherlands. Considerable hospital variation was observed for RT in stage I and the proportion of chemoradiotherapy among all RT schemes. Data from clinical auditing enable evaluation of national practice and current standards from both a scientific and international perspective.
OBJECTIVES: Internationally, the use of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer varies largely, related to different decision-making based on the harm-benefit ratio. In the Dutch guideline, RT is indicated in all cT2-4 tumours. We aimed to evaluate the use of RT in the Netherlands and to discuss Dutch practice in the context of current literature. METHODS: Data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit (DSCA) were used and 6784 patients surgically treated for primary rectal cancer in 2009-2011 were included. The application and type of RT were described according to age, comorbidity, tumour localization and tumour stage at population level with analysis of hospital variation for specific subsets. RESULTS: In total, 85% of patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer received RT. Comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index 2+) and older age (≥70 years) were associated with a slight decrease in application of RT (75 and 80% respectively). In stage I tumours, 77% of patients received RT, but large hospital variation existed (0-100%). The proportion chemoradiotherapy of the whole group of RT increased with increasing N-stage, increasing T-stage, decreasing distance from the anus, younger age and less comorbidity with hospital variation from 0 to 73%. CONCLUSION: From a European perspective, a high percentage of rectal cancerpatients are treated with RT in the Netherlands. Considerable hospital variation was observed for RT in stage I and the proportion of chemoradiotherapy among all RT schemes. Data from clinical auditing enable evaluation of national practice and current standards from both a scientific and international perspective.
Authors: Emily F Midura; Andrew D Jung; Meghan C Daly; Dennis J Hanseman; Bradley R Davis; Shimul A Shah; Ian M Paquette Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Gijsbert D Musters; Didi A M Sloothaak; Sapho Roodbeen; Anna A W van Geloven; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: M G Torras; E Canals; C Muñoz-Montplet; A Vidal; D Jurado; A Eraso; S Villà; M Caro; J Molero; M Macià; M Puigdemont; E González-Muñoz; A López; F Guedea; J M Borras Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Jozette J C Stienen; Rosella P M G Hermens; Lianne Wennekes; Saskia A M van de Schans; Richard W M van der Maazen; Helena M Dekker; Janine Liefers; Johan H J M van Krieken; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Petronella B Ottevanger Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: E J A Morris; P J Finan; K Spencer; I Geh; A Crellin; P Quirke; J D Thomas; S Lawton; R Adams; D Sebag-Montefiore Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Louis J X Giesen; Wernard A A Borstlap; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis; Cornelis Verhoef; Pim B Olthof Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 2.885