Literature DB >> 23816006

Evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic patients.

Nicolas P Burnett1, Erik M Dunki-Jacobs, Glenda G Callender, Ryan J Anderson, Charles R Scoggins, Kelly M McMasters, Robert C G Martin.   

Abstract

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification is commonly used for staging hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This system assumes the coexistence of cirrhosis; however, a significant proportion of patients with HCC present without cirrhosis. Recently, an alternative system was proposed that stratifies patients according to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level. The aim of this study was to apply the AFP staging system to noncirrhotic patients with HCC and evaluate its ability to predict overall survival (OS). A prospective hepatopancreatobiliary database was reviewed for all patients with a diagnosis of HCC. Patients were staged based on BCLC classification as well as by AFP stage according to four levels: less than 10 ng/mL, 10 to 150 ng/mL, 150 to 500 ng/mL, and greater than 500 ng/mL. Cirrhotic patients were compared with noncirrhotic patients in terms of patient demographics and HCC stage. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of OS was performed for noncirrhotic patients according to BCLC and AFP staging systems. Cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients differed significantly in terms of median age at presentation (64 vs 70 years, P < 0.001) and gender (76 vs 65% male, P = 0.006). BCLS staging classification did not distinguish between cirrhotics and noncirrhotics (P = 0.733), whereas AFP staging demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.0001). KM analysis of OS for noncirrhotic patients with HCC was significant for both the BCLC and the AFP staging systems (P = 0.003 vs P < 0.0001, respectively). Patients presenting with HCC in the absence of cirrhosis appear to have different characteristics than patients with cirrhosis. Staging according to AFP level is an appropriate predictor of prognosis in noncirrhotic patients with HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  6 in total

Review 1.  Staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Kinoshita; Hiroshi Onoda; Nao Fushiya; Kazuhiko Koike; Hirokazu Nishino; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  Preoperative Alpha-Fetoprotein Has No Prognostic Role in Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Non-Cirrhotic Patients After Surgical Resection.

Authors:  Tian-Ming Gao; Dou-Sheng Bai; Jian-Jun Qian; Ping Chen; Sheng-Jie Jin; Guo-Qing Jiang
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Integrated tumor stromal features of hepatocellular carcinoma reveals two distinct subtypes with prognostic/predictive significance.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jun Han; Kefei Yuan; Hong Wu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Association of Postoperative Biomarker Response with Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and High Alpha-Fetoprotein Expressions (>400 ng/ml).

Authors:  Lei Liang; Ming-Da Wang; Yao-Ming Zhang; Wan-Guang Zhang; Cheng-Wu Zhang; Wan Yee Lau; Feng Shen; Timothy M Pawlik; Dong-Sheng Huang; Tian Yang
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  Outcome after Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Noncirrhotic Liver-A Single Centre Study.

Authors:  Lea Penzkofer; Jens Mittler; Stefan Heinrich; Nicolas Wachter; Beate K Straub; Roman Kloeckner; Fabian Stoehr; Simon Johannes Gairing; Fabian Bartsch; Hauke Lang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Aakash Desai; Sonia Sandhu; Jin-Ping Lai; Dalbir Singh Sandhu
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.