Literature DB >> 23815996

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single institution experience of 176 surgical patients.

Sarah B Fisher1, Steven C Kim, David A Kooby, Kenneth Cardona, Maria C Russell, Keith A Delman, Charles A Staley, Shishir K Maithel.   

Abstract

Large single-institution series of patients undergoing resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are lacking. Clinicopathologic characteristics and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively collected and analyzed from patients undergoing resection for GIST from 2002 to 2011. One hundred seventy-six patients were identified; 156 underwent resection of primary nonmetastatic disease. KIT mutations were identified in 131 patients (84.0%). Of the 156 patients with primary disease, the most common site was the stomach (75.6%). Tumors were categorized as very low (24.4%), low (35.9%), intermediate (12.2%), high (24.4%), or unknown (3.2%) risk. Symptomatic patients more often had high risk (35.6 vs 9.8%; P < 0.0001) and larger tumors (7.3 vs 3.0 cm; P < 0.0001). Forty-seven patients (30.1%) underwent laparoscopic resection (LR). Compared with open surgery, LR was performed for smaller tumors (3.8 vs 6.2 cm; P = 0.002). Positive margin rates were similar (4.3% LR vs 10.2% open; P = 0.346). Median follow-up for the 156 patients with primary tumors was 32.9 months; mean overall survival was 120.9 months (median not reached). Of the 20 patients with metastatic GIST (excluded from above analysis), five patients (25.0%) died of disease with a median follow-up of 15.9 months. Most patients with resectable primary GIST have a favorable prognosis. The presence of symptoms directly related to GIST may be associated with a poor prognosis and is likely related to increased tumor size. Laparoscopic resection is well tolerated and does not appear to compromise outcomes in well-selected patients. Highly selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23815996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu-Cheng Zhou; Yi-Ping Mou; Xiao-Wu Xu; Wei-Wei Jin; Harsha Ajoodhea
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in sarcomatosis from gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Michelle L Bryan; Nora C Fitzgerald; Edward A Levine; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi-Long Chen; Yu Pan; Jia-Qin Cai; Di Wu; Ke Chen; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 4.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Bin Zhang; Yue-Long Liang; Lin Ji; Shun-Jie Xia; Yu Pan; Xue-Yong Zheng; Xian-Fa Wang; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Does laparoscopic surgery provide an adequate oncologic resection?

Authors:  Joseph J Kim; James Y Lim; Scott Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.