Literature DB >> 23815978

Can control of soil erosion mitigate water pollution by sediments?

R J Rickson1.   

Abstract

The detrimental impact of sediment and associated pollutants on water quality is widely acknowledged, with many watercourses in the UK failing to meet the standard of 'good ecological status'. Catchment sediment budgets show that hill slope erosion processes can be significant sources of waterborne sediment, with rates of erosion likely to increase given predicted future weather patterns. However, linking on-site erosion rates with off-site impacts is complicated because of the limited data on soil erosion rates in the UK and the dynamic nature of the source-pathway-receptor continuum over space and time. Even so, soil erosion control measures are designed to reduce sediment production (source) and mobilisation/transport (pathway) on hill slopes, with consequent mitigation of pollution incidents in watercourses (receptors). The purpose of this paper is to review the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of erosion control measures used in the UK to reduce sediment loads of hill slope origin in watercourses. Although over 73 soil erosion mitigation measures have been identified from the literature, empirical data on erosion control effectiveness are limited. Baseline comparisons for the 18 measures where data do exist reveal erosion control effectiveness is highly variable over time and between study locations. Given the limitations of the evidence base in terms of geographical coverage and duration of monitoring, performance of the different measures cannot be extrapolated to other areas. This uncertainty in effectiveness has implications for implementing erosion/sediment risk reduction policies, where quantified targets are stipulated, as is the case in the EU Freshwater Fish and draft Soil Framework Directives. Also, demonstrating technical effectiveness of erosion control measures alone will not encourage uptake by land managers: quantifying the costs and benefits of adopting erosion mitigation is equally important, but these are uncertain and difficult to express in monetary terms.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erosion control effectiveness; Risk reduction policy; Sediment; Sediment borne pollutants; Soil erosion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23815978     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Spatial variability of available soil microelements in an ecological functional zone of Beijing.

Authors:  Huichun Ye; Chongyang Shen; Yuanfang Huang; Wenjiang Huang; Shiwen Zhang; Xiaohong Jia
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Sedimentary phosphorus accumulation and distribution in the continuum of three cascade dams (Creuse River, France).

Authors:  Anne Rapin; Marion Rabiet; Brice Mourier; Malgorzata Grybos; Véronique Deluchat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  A New Modeling Approach To Prioritize Riparian Restoration To Reduce Sediment Loading in Two Virginia River Basins.

Authors:  Lisa N Scott; Amy M Villamagna; Paul L Angermeier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Global vulnerability of soil ecosystems to erosion.

Authors:  Carlos A Guerra; Isabel M D Rosa; Emiliana Valentini; Florian Wolf; Federico Filipponi; Dirk N Karger; Alessandra Nguyen Xuan; Jerome Mathieu; Patrick Lavelle; Nico Eisenhauer
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.848

5.  Multiyear Links between Water Chemistry, Algal Chlorophyll, Drought-Flood Regime, and Nutrient Enrichment in a Morphologically Complex Reservoir.

Authors:  Jang HaRa; Usman Atique; Kwang-Guk An
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A novel approach for assessing watershed susceptibility using weighted overlay and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology: a case study in Eagle Creek Watershed, USA.

Authors:  Fadhil K Jabbar; Katherine Grote; Robert E Tucker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.