Literature DB >> 23815662

Unification of regression-based methods for the analysis of natural selection.

Michael B Morrissey1, Krzysztof Sakrejda.   

Abstract

Regression analyses are central to characterization of the form and strength of natural selection in nature. Two common analyses that are currently used to characterize selection are (1) least squares-based approximation of the individual relative fitness surface for the purpose of obtaining quantitatively useful selection gradients, and (2) spline-based estimation of (absolute) fitness functions to obtain flexible inference of the shape of functions by which fitness and phenotype are related. These two sets of methodologies are often implemented in parallel to provide complementary inferences of the form of natural selection. We unify these two analyses, providing a method whereby selection gradients can be obtained for a given observed distribution of phenotype and characterization of a function relating phenotype to fitness. The method allows quantitatively useful selection gradients to be obtained from analyses of selection that adequately model nonnormal distributions of fitness, and provides unification of the two previously separate regression-based fitness analyses. We demonstrate the method by calculating directional and quadratic selection gradients associated with a smooth regression-based generalized additive model of the relationship between neonatal survival and the phenotypic traits of gestation length and birth mass in humans.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth mass; fitness; generalized additive models; gestation length; microevolution; natural selection; selection gradients; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23815662     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  21 in total

1.  Natural selection fluctuates at an extremely fine spatial scale inside a wild population of snapdragon plants.

Authors:  Pascal Marrot; Mathieu Latutrie; Jésaëlle Piquet; Benoit Pujol
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Decomposing phenotypic skew and its effects on the predicted response to strong selection.

Authors:  Joel L Pick; Hannah E Lemon; Caroline E Thomson; Jarrod D Hadfield
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 19.100

3.  Modelling heterogeneity among fitness functions using random regression.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; Gustavo de Los Campos; Scott P Egan; James R Ott
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.781

4.  Ant cuticular hydrocarbons are heritable and associated with variation in colony productivity.

Authors:  Justin Walsh; Luigi Pontieri; Patrizia d'Ettorre; Timothy A Linksvayer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Social selection is density dependent but makes little contribution to total selection in New Zealand giraffe weevils.

Authors:  David N Fisher; Rebecca J LeGrice; Christina J Painting
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Social animal models for quantifying plasticity, assortment, and selection on interacting phenotypes.

Authors:  Jordan S Martin; Adrian V Jaeggi
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.516

7.  Effects of spring temperatures on the strength of selection on timing of reproduction in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp; Arild Husby; Michael Morrisey; Iván de la Hera; Francisco Pulido; Christiaan Both
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Environmental coupling of heritability and selection is rare and of minor evolutionary significance in wild populations.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Antica Culina; Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 15.460

9.  Selection on skewed characters and the paradox of stasis.

Authors:  Suzanne Bonamour; Céline Teplitsky; Anne Charmantier; Pierre-André Crochet; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Variation in pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male genital size in two species of lygaeid bug.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; David M Shuker
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.