Literature DB >> 23815385

Impulsivity affects suboptimal gambling-like choice by pigeons.

Jennifer R Laude1, Joshua S Beckmann1, Carter W Daniels1, Thomas R Zentall1.   

Abstract

Pigeons prefer a low-probability, high-payoff but suboptimal alternative over a reliable low-payoff optimal alternative (i.e., one that results in more food). This finding is analogous to suboptimal human monetary gambling because in both cases there appears to be an overemphasis of the occurrence of the winning event (a jackpot) and an underemphasis of losing events. In the present research we found that pigeons chose suboptimally to the degree that they were impulsive as indexed by the steeper slope of the hyperbolic delay-discounting function (i.e., the shorter the delay they would accept in a smaller-sooner/larger-later procedure). These correlational findings have implications for the mechanisms underlying suboptimal choice by humans (e.g., problem gamblers) and they suggest that high baseline levels of impulsivity can enhance acquisition of a gambling habit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23815385     DOI: 10.1037/xan0000001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  9 in total

1.  Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; James W Diller; Malvina O Pietrzykowski
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditions.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Juraj Koci; Yoonseong Park
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jacob P Case; Jonathan R Berry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?

Authors:  Danielle M Andrews; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Michael J Beran; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?

Authors:  Jay E Hinnenkamp; Timothy A Shahan; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

Review 8.  Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  A marker of biological ageing predicts adult risk preference in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors:  Clare Andrews; Daniel Nettle; Sophie Reichert; Tom Bedford; Pat Monaghan; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 2.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.