Literature DB >> 23815193

A comparison of fasting plasma glucose and glucose challenge test for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus.

G K Poomalar1, V Rangaswamy.   

Abstract

Glucose challenge test (GCT) has been used as an effective screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), though it has its own limitations. Hence, we assessed the effectiveness of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) as a simpler alternative procedure. A prospective study was done in 500 pregnant women with gestational age between 22 and 37 weeks. FPG, GCT and GTT were performed in all patients using the glucose oxidase/peroxidase method. The overall sensitivity and specificity of GCT were 75.0% and 92.0%, respectively and the corresponding values for FPG were 88.8% and 95.2%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 42.2% and 97.9% for GCT and 59.2% and 99.1% for FPG, respectively. We conclude that FPG can be used as an effective screening tool for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23815193     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2013.771156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  5 in total

1.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: Screening with fasting plasma glucose.

Authors:  Mukesh M Agarwal
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-07-25

2.  Single Fasting Plasma Glucose Versus 75-g Oral Glucose-Tolerance Test in Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Songying Shen; Jinhua Lu; Lifang Zhang; Jianrong He; Weidong Li; Niannian Chen; Xingxuan Wen; Wanqing Xiao; Mingyang Yuan; Lan Qiu; Kar Keung Cheng; Huimin Xia; Ben Willem J Mol; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Development of a fasting blood glucose-based strategy to diagnose women with gestational diabetes mellitus at increased risk of adverse outcomes in a COVID-19 environment.

Authors:  Michael d'Emden; Donald McLeod; Jacobus Ungerer; Charles Appleton; David Kanowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characteristics of different risk factors and fasting plasma glucose for identifying GDM when using IADPSG criteria: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maryam Saeedi; Ulf Hanson; David Simmons; Helena Fadl
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Accuracy of screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus in Southeast Asia: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Sattamat Lappharat; Tippawan Liabsuetrakul
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.