Literature DB >> 23814731

Target scan-the experience at saveetha medical college.

Navamani Hephzibah Kirubamani1, M R Meenatshi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The identification of foetal anomalies in utero is important. The prenatal detection of such abnormalities, often aids in planning the appropriate obstetrical management.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the antenatal prevalence of the major congenital anomalies and the malformation patterns which were seen in low risk patients of our hospital population. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional and an observational study. SETTINGS: This study was done in the Radiology and Obstetrics Department of Saveetha Medical College, India. DURATION: It extended from June 2012 to Aug 2012. SAMPLE SIZE: It was done on 250 patients.
RESULTS: The incidence of foetal anomalies in our study was 2.97%. The mean maternal/mean gestational age at diagnosis was 24.5years /20 weeks. Among the 250 cases, five cases had lethal anomalies and two cases had non lethal anomalies. The lethal anomalies were cystic hygroma, body stalk anomaly, multicystic kidney, non immune hydrops and a Dandy Walker variant. All of the patients were primi gravida, without any risk factors. Two non lethal anomalies which were found were a duplication cyst in the foetal abdomen and a single umbilical artery. Foetal kartotyping and foetal autopsies were done in two cases. The parents of the offsprings with the lethal anomalies were counseled and they decided to go for termination of the pregnancies. It was offered to them. For the non- lethal cases, complete postnatal work ups were done by the paediatrician.
CONCLUSION: The sonographic demonstration of a lethal foetal anomalies is mandatory, which may dramatically alter the obstetrical management and it also aids in the parental preparation. Future Scope: In our study, all the non compatible with life anomalies were seen in the young primi without any risk factors and hence, the environmental cause has to be studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foetal anomaly; Major congenital anomalies; Target scan

Year:  2013        PMID: 23814731      PMCID: PMC3681058          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5462.2962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  5 in total

1.  [Ultrasound screening at 18-20 weeks.].

Authors:  R T Geirsson
Journal:  Laeknabladid       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 0.548

Review 2.  Fetal and perinatal autopsy in prenatally diagnosed fetal abnormalities with normal karyotype.

Authors:  Valérie Désilets; Luc Laurier Oligny
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2011-10

3.  Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Pekka Taipale; Martti Ammälä; Riitta Salonen; Vilho Hiilesmaa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Alain Gagnon
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2009-09

5.  Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.

Authors:  B G Ewigman; J P Crane; F D Frigoletto; M L LeFevre; R P Bain; D McNellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.