PURPOSE: A common treatment for pediatric femur fractures is intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion. Elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) are often used for these procedures in heavier patients, but the potential for complications and malunion is greater. We describe here a rigid IMN specifically designed for adolescents, the adolescent lateral entry femoral nail (ALFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the recovery and complications for patients treated with ESINs to those treated with the ALFN. METHODS: Our study design was a retrospective cohort study. We performed a review of medical records of 22 children ages 10-17 requiring surgical fixation of a femur fracture for a 2½-year period. Patients selected for the study had traumatic diaphyseal femur fractures and were treated with ESINs without end-caps or ALFNs. Our analyses evaluated injury, surgical, and outcome information for all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were eligible for inclusion and were divided into two groups according to their treatment: the ESIN group with 7 patients and the ALFN group with 15 patients. We then performed a comparison of complications and recovery for these patients. The mean time to full weight-bearing was significantly less for the ALFN group (4.1 weeks; SD, 2.2), than the ESIN group (9.4 weeks; SD 3.9). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of major or minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Older, heavier pediatric patients treated for femur fracture with ALFNs had a shorter recovery time than similar patients treated with ESINs. However, the outcomes for both groups were satisfactory.
PURPOSE: A common treatment for pediatric femur fractures is intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion. Elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESINs) are often used for these procedures in heavier patients, but the potential for complications and malunion is greater. We describe here a rigid IMN specifically designed for adolescents, the adolescent lateral entry femoral nail (ALFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the recovery and complications for patients treated with ESINs to those treated with the ALFN. METHODS: Our study design was a retrospective cohort study. We performed a review of medical records of 22 children ages 10-17 requiring surgical fixation of a femur fracture for a 2½-year period. Patients selected for the study had traumatic diaphyseal femur fractures and were treated with ESINs without end-caps or ALFNs. Our analyses evaluated injury, surgical, and outcome information for all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were eligible for inclusion and were divided into two groups according to their treatment: the ESIN group with 7 patients and the ALFN group with 15 patients. We then performed a comparison of complications and recovery for these patients. The mean time to full weight-bearing was significantly less for the ALFN group (4.1 weeks; SD, 2.2), than the ESIN group (9.4 weeks; SD 3.9). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of major or minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Older, heavier pediatric patients treated for femur fracture with ALFNs had a shorter recovery time than similar patients treated with ESINs. However, the outcomes for both groups were satisfactory.
Authors: Matthew R Garner; Suneel B Bhat; Ilkhom Khujanazarov; John M Flynn; David Spiegel Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: William M Ricci; John Schwappach; Michael Tucker; Kevin Coupe; Angel Brandt; Roy Sanders; Ross Leighton Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: J Eric Gordon; Nitin Khanna; Scott J Luhmann; Matthew B Dobbs; Madeleine R Ortman; Perry L Schoenecker Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Berend Linke; Chloe Ansari Moein; Oliver Bösl; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Chris van der Werken; Karsten Schwieger; Keito Ito Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: S Oberthür; S Piatek; H Krause; H Rüther; P J Roch; A Zoch; W Lehmann; S Sehmisch; M R Klauser Journal: Chirurg Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 0.955