Literature DB >> 23814429

Chromoblastomycosis in a renal allograft recipient.

Y S Sooraj1, G K Nainan, M Eapen, A J Immanuel, R R Pillai.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23814429      PMCID: PMC3692156          DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.111868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Nephrol        ISSN: 0971-4065


× No keyword cloud information.
A 50-year-old lady presented with a progressive ulcero-proliferative lesion over the right heel for over 1 month. She was diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease 18 months earlier and had undergone a successful live-related renal transplantation 12 months ago. She was on prednisolone, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil. Ten months later, she developed severe allograft dysfunction, and renal allograft biopsy revealed acute humoral rejection. She was treated with dialysis, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. Cyclosporine was replaced with tacrolimus. Her allograft function improved but did not reach the baseline. Clinical evaluation revealed an ulcero-proliferative lesion measuring 2 × 1.5 × 0.3 cm. The lesion was completely excised. Sections from skin epidermis showed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, acanthosis, spongiosis, and an area of ulceration with a sinus tract. Exocytosis of neutrophils with microabscesses was also noted. There was marked ballooning degeneration in the upper layers of the epidermis. Dermis showed dense lichenoid granulomatous inflammatory infiltrate. Multiple small abscesses composed predominantly of neutrophils admixed with lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils were seen. Numerous giant cells containing multiple brown-pigmented, ovoid, thick-walled, sclerotic/copper-penny/Medlar bodies were observed, singly scattered and in chain-like clusters. There was no budding and many of the sclerotic bodies showed septations [Figure 1]. These were characteristic of chromoblastomycosis.
Figure 1

Light microscopy (× 40, magnification) showing numerous giant cells containing multiple brown-pigmented, ovoid, thick-walled sclerotic/ copper-penny/Medlar bodies seen singly scattered and in chain-like clusters (arrows). These are characteristic of chromoblastomycosis

Light microscopy (× 40, magnification) showing numerous giant cells containing multiple brown-pigmented, ovoid, thick-walled sclerotic/ copper-penny/Medlar bodies seen singly scattered and in chain-like clusters (arrows). These are characteristic of chromoblastomycosis She was treated with oral itraconazole for a period of 4 weeks. There was no recurrence of the lesion and the wound has healed well. Terra et al., first used the term chromoblastomycosis in cases of polymorphic fungal disease of the lower limbs presenting with nodules or verrucous plaques with hyperkeratosis and acanthosis of the affected epithelial tissues, which could develop into complications such as ulceration, lymphedema, and squamous cell carcinoma.[1] It is mainly caused by the fungal genera Fonsecaea, Phialophora, and Cladophialophora that are saprophytes in soil and plants.[2] The vast majority of cases are attributed to Fonsecaea pedroso.[3] The diagnosis is based on Potassium Hydroxide examination, identification of organism in histologic sections, culture of the organism that reveals slow-growing green to black colonies, and microscopic appearance of the conidia formation, which helps in identifying the species.[4] Medlar bodies seen in either pathologic or microbiologic examinations are diagnostic. They are defined as rounded, brown structures, 5–10 mm in diameter, with thick walls and internal septations.[5] The characteristic lesion is the warty papule or plaque. The disease spreads to the adjacent skin by forming satellite nodules. Metastatic spread to other organs is very rare.[6] Few cases have been reported from India also[78] and this is the second case to be reported among renal allograft recipients.[9]
  7 in total

1.  Chromoblastomycosis and related infections: new concepts, differential diagnosis, and nomenclatorial implications.

Authors:  A L Carrión
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.736

2.  Chromoblastomycosis.

Authors:  S K Sayal; G K Prasad; K Z Jawed; S Sanghi; S Satyanarayana
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis in a renal transplant recipient: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  V Jha; V S Krishna; A Chakrabarti; P K Sharma; K Sud; H S Kohli; V Sakhuja
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Chromoblastomycosis in India.

Authors:  N L Sharma; R C Sharma; P S Grover; M L Gupta; A K Sharma; V K Mahajan
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.736

Review 5.  Chromoblastomycosis: clinical presentation and management.

Authors:  M Ameen
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.470

6.  Chromoblastomycosis in sub-tropical regions of India.

Authors:  Ajanta Sharma; Naba K Hazarika; Deepak Gupta
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 7.  Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and therapy of infections caused by dematiaceous fungi.

Authors:  M E Brandt; D W Warnock
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.714

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Chromoblastomycosis in India: Review of 169 cases.

Authors:  Reshu Agarwal; Gagandeep Singh; Arnab Ghosh; Kaushal Kumar Verma; Mragnayani Pandey; Immaculata Xess
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-08-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.