Literature DB >> 23814381

Development and evaluation of a treadmill-based exercise tolerance test in cardiac rehabilitation.

Julie Dunagan1, Jenny Adams, Dunlei Cheng, Stephanie Barton, Janet Bigej-Cerqua, Lisa Mims, Jennifer Molden, Valerie Anderson.   

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation exercise prescriptions should be based on exercise stress tests; however, limitations in performing stress tests in this setting typically force reliance on subjective measures like the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). We developed and evaluated a treadmill-based exercise tolerance test (ETT) to provide objective physiologic measures without requiring additional equipment or insurance charges. The ETT is stopped when the patient's Borg scale rating of perceived exertion (RPE) reaches 15 or when any sign/symptom indicates risk of an adverse event. Outcomes of the study included reasons for stopping; maximum heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and rate pressure product; and adverse events. We tested equivalence to the DASI as requiring the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between DASI and ETT metabolic equivalents (METs) to fall within the range (-1, 1). Among 502 consecutive cardiac rehabilitation patients, one suffered a panic attack; no other adverse events occurred. Most (80%) stopped because they reached an RPE of 15; the remaining 20% were stopped on indications that continuing risked an adverse event. Mean maximum systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and rate pressure product were significantly (P < 0.001) below thresholds of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Two patients' heart rates exceeded 150 beats per minute, but their rate pressure products remained below 36,000. The mean difference between DASI and ETT METs was -0.8 (-0.98, -0.65), indicating equivalence at our threshold. In conclusion, the ETT can be performed within cardiac rehabilitation, providing a functional capacity assessment equivalent to the DASI and objective physiologic measures for developing exercise prescriptions and measuring progress.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23814381      PMCID: PMC3684288          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2013.11928972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  6 in total

1.  Physical activity and functional capacity measurement in women: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study.

Authors:  C N Bairey Merz; M Olson; S McGorray; D L Pakstis; K Zell; C R Rickens; S F Kelsey; V Bittner; B L Sharaf; G Sopko
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000-09

2.  A perceptually regulated, graded exercise test predicts peak oxygen uptake during treadmill exercise in active and sedentary participants.

Authors:  Roger Eston; Harrison Evans; James Faulkner; Danielle Lambrick; Harran Al-Rahamneh; Gaynor Parfitt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index).

Authors:  M A Hlatky; R E Boineau; M B Higginbotham; K L Lee; D B Mark; R M Califf; F R Cobb; D B Pryor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Alessandro Mezzani; Larry F Hamm; Andrew M Jones; Patrick E McBride; Trine Moholdt; James A Stone; Axel Urhausen; Mark A Williams
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

5.  A new paradigm for post-cardiac event resistance exercise guidelines.

Authors:  Jenny Adams; Matthew J Cline; Matt Hubbard; Tiffany McCullough; Julie Hartman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.

Authors:  B Jones; P Jarvis; J A Lewis; A F Ebbutt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Significant discrepancies exist between clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of functional capacity by validated scoring tools during preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  John Whittemore Stokes; Jonathan Porter Wanderer; Matthew David McEvoy
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-13

2.  Physiological Responses During the Lower Body Positive Pressure Supported Treadmill Test.

Authors:  Ka-Young Lee; Jae-Young Han; Ji-Hyun Kim; Dong-Ju Kim; In-Sung Choi
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-10-31

3.  Quality of Life and Physical Ability Changes After Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Byung Joo Lee; Jin Young Go; Ae Ryung Kim; Seong Min Chun; Minhyuk Park; Dong Heon Yang; Hun Sik Park; Tae-Du Jung
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 4.  Which functional outcome measures can we use as a surrogate for exercise capacity during remote cardiopulmonary rehabilitation assessments? A rapid narrative review.

Authors:  Linzy Houchen-Wolloff; Enya Daynes; Amye Watt; Emma Chaplin; Nikki Gardiner; Sally Singh
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-12-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.