Literature DB >> 23814246

Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle.

B K Moor1, S Bouaicha, D A Rothenfluh, A Sukthankar, C Gerber.   

Abstract

We hypothesised that a large acromial cover with an upwardly tilted glenoid fossa would be associated with degenerative rotator cuff tears (RCTs), and conversely, that a short acromion with an inferiorly inclined glenoid would be associated with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). This hypothesis was tested using a new radiological parameter, the critical shoulder angle (CSA), which combines the measurements of inclination of the glenoid and the lateral extension of the acromion (the acromion index). The CSA was measured on standardised radiographs of three groups: 1) a control group of 94 asymptomatic shoulders with normal rotator cuffs and no OA; 2) a group of 102 shoulders with MRI-documented full-thickness RCTs without OA; and 3) a group of 102 shoulders with primary OA and no RCTs noted during total shoulder replacement. The mean CSA was 33.1° (26.8° to 38.6°) in the control group, 38.0° (29.5° to 43.5°) in the RCT group and 28.1° (18.6° to 35.8°) in the OA group. Of patients with a CSA > 35°, 84% were in the RCT group and of those with a CSA < 30°, 93% were in the OA group. We therefore concluded that primary glenohumeral OA is associated with significantly smaller degenerative RCTs with significantly larger CSAs than asymptomatic shoulders without these pathologies. These findings suggest that individual quantitative anatomy may imply biomechanics that are likely to induce specific types of degenerative joint disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid inclination; Lateral acromial extension; Radiological measurement; Rotator cuff disease; Shoulder biomechanics; Shoulder osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23814246     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  101 in total

1.  Age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy: a radiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; Sonja Soschynski; Philipp Lechler; Steffen Ruchholtz; Florian Debus; Tim Schwarting; Michael Frink
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Rotator cuff biology and biomechanics: a review of normal and pathological conditions.

Authors:  Julianne Huegel; Alexis A Williams; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Decision-making in massive rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  André Thès; Philippe Hardy; Klaus Bak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI.

Authors:  Ulrich J Spiegl; Marilee P Horan; Sean W Smith; Charles P Ho; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The association between a low critical shoulder angle and SLAP lesions.

Authors:  Thilo Patzer; Nina Wimmer; Pablo Emilio Verde; Martin Hufeland; Ruediger Krauspe; Hannes Kenji Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Improved outcomes with arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Christoph Katthagen; Gabriella Bucci; Gilbert Moatshe; Dimitri S Tahal; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  High performance of critical shoulder angle for diagnosing rotator cuff tears on radiographs.

Authors:  Jae Gwang Song; Seong Jong Yun; Young Woong Song; Sun Hwa Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Clinical Faceoff: What is the Role of Acromioplasty in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease?

Authors:  Edward G McFarland; Frederick A Matsen; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison of the critical shoulder angle in radiographs and computed tomography.

Authors:  Samy Bouaicha; Christine Ehrmann; Ksenija Slankamenac; William D Regan; Beat K Moor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: the Proximal Humeral Arthroplasty Revision Osseous inSufficiency (PHAROS) Classification System.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson; Pascal Boileau; Jay D Keener; James M Gregory; Dane H Salazar; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.