Literature DB >> 23814103

Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review.

A Indekeu1, K Dierickx, P Schotsmans, K R Daniels, P Rober, T D'Hooghe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND In recent years, changes in attitudes towards (non-)disclosure of donor conception to offspring and/or others have been observed. Studies have started to identify possible factors that contribute to these changes that are relevant for clinics, counsellors and policy-makers in their approach to the disclosure process. The aim of this systematic review was to integrate the existing knowledge on factors that influence the disclosure decision-making process of donor conception to offspring and/or others in heterosexual couples, and to discuss future trends and concerns. METHODS A bibliographic search of English, French, German and Dutch language publications of five computerized databases was undertaken from January 1980 to March 2012. A Cochrane Database systematic review approach was applied. RESULTS A total of 43 studies met the inclusion criteria, and these represented 36 study populations. The review shows that the parents' disclosure decision-making process is influenced by a myriad of intrapersonal, interpersonal, social and family life cycle features. These influences were not necessarily independent but rather were interwoven and overlapping. Theoretical frameworks have not yet been used to explain how the different factors influenced disclosure. Methodological limitations of the original publications (lack of information, several factors included in one study, descriptive character of studies) and this review (multiple factors that may interact) which hindered integration of the findings are outlined. CONCLUSIONS Intrapersonal, interpersonal, social and family life cycle factors influence the parents' disclosure decision-making process. The review has demonstrated the need for the development of a theoretical model to enable integration of the identified influencing factors. Further research is needed on the role of stigma, confrontation efficacy, extended family, donor siblings' characteristics, cross-border treatment, culture, gender and socio-educational factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disclosure; donor insemination; embryo donation; oocyte donation; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23814103     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  12 in total

1.  Live birth in a 46 year old using autologous oocytes cryopreserved for a duration of 3 years: a case report documenting fertility preservation at an advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  Susan M Maxwell; Kara N Goldman; Patty A Labella; Caroline McCaffrey; Nicole L Noyes; James Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Kirby Adlam; Alana D Steffen; Martha Driessnack; Harold D Grotevant; Susan C Klock; Lauri Pasch; Valerie Gruss
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2022-07-31

Review 3.  Process and Pitfalls of Sperm Cryopreservation.

Authors:  Hamoun Rozati; Thomas Handley; Channa N Jayasena
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Understanding parents' intention to disclose the donor conception to their child by application of the theory of planned behaviour.

Authors:  Claudia Lampic; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Kimmo Sorjonen; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor.

Authors:  J E Scheib; E McCormick; J Benward; A Ruby
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-12-23

6.  It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation.

Authors:  S Isaksson; A Skoog-Svanberg; G Sydsjö; L Linell; C Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Parenting stress and its association with perceived agreement about the disclosure decision in parents following donor conception.

Authors:  Anja J Gebhardt; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Astrid Indekeu; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman; Sophie Zadeh; Venessa Smith; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France.

Authors:  N Kalampalikis; M Doumergue; S Zadeh
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-03-10

10.  How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2017-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.