OBJECTIVE: Seizures have been implicated as a cause of secondary brain injury, but the systemic and cerebral physiologic effects of seizures after acute brain injury are poorly understood. METHODS: We analyzed intracortical electroencephalographic (EEG) and multimodality physiological recordings in 48 comatose subarachnoid hemorrhage patients to better characterize the physiological response to seizures after acute brain injury. RESULTS: Intracortical seizures were seen in 38% of patients, and 8% had surface seizures. Intracortical seizures were accompanied by elevated heart rate (p = 0.001), blood pressure (p < 0.001), and respiratory rate (p < 0.001). There were trends for rising cerebral perfusion pressure (p = 0.03) and intracranial pressure (p = 0.06) seen after seizure onset. Intracortical seizure-associated increases in global brain metabolism, partial brain tissue oxygenation, and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) did not reach significance, but a trend for a pronounced delayed rCBF rise was seen for surface seizures (p = 0.08). Functional outcome was very poor for patients with severe background attenuation without seizures and best for those without severe attenuation or seizures (77% vs 0% dead or severely disabled, respectively). Outcome was intermediate for those with seizures independent of the background EEG and worse for those with intracortical only seizures when compared to those with intracortical and scalp seizures (50% and 25% death or severe disability, respectively). INTERPRETATION: We replicated in humans complex physiologic processes associated with seizures after acute brain injury previously described in laboratory experiments and illustrated differences such as the delayed increase in rCBF. These real world physiologic observations may permit more successful translation of laboratory research to the bedside.
OBJECTIVE:Seizures have been implicated as a cause of secondary brain injury, but the systemic and cerebral physiologic effects of seizures after acute brain injury are poorly understood. METHODS: We analyzed intracortical electroencephalographic (EEG) and multimodality physiological recordings in 48 comatose subarachnoid hemorrhagepatients to better characterize the physiological response to seizures after acute brain injury. RESULTS: Intracortical seizures were seen in 38% of patients, and 8% had surface seizures. Intracortical seizures were accompanied by elevated heart rate (p = 0.001), blood pressure (p < 0.001), and respiratory rate (p < 0.001). There were trends for rising cerebral perfusion pressure (p = 0.03) and intracranial pressure (p = 0.06) seen after seizure onset. Intracortical seizure-associated increases in global brain metabolism, partial brain tissue oxygenation, and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) did not reach significance, but a trend for a pronounced delayed rCBF rise was seen for surface seizures (p = 0.08). Functional outcome was very poor for patients with severe background attenuation without seizures and best for those without severe attenuation or seizures (77% vs 0% dead or severely disabled, respectively). Outcome was intermediate for those with seizures independent of the background EEG and worse for those with intracortical only seizures when compared to those with intracortical and scalp seizures (50% and 25% death or severe disability, respectively). INTERPRETATION: We replicated in humans complex physiologic processes associated with seizures after acute brain injury previously described in laboratory experiments and illustrated differences such as the delayed increase in rCBF. These real world physiologic observations may permit more successful translation of laboratory research to the bedside.
Authors: P Vajkoczy; H Roth; P Horn; T Lucke; C Thomé; U Hubner; G T Martin; C Zappletal; E Klar; L Schilling; P Schmiedek Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jan Claassen; Lawrence J Hirsch; Jennifer A Frontera; Andres Fernandez; Michael Schmidt; Gregory Kapinos; John Wittman; E Sander Connolly; Ronald G Emerson; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: I A C van der Bilt; D Hasan; W P Vandertop; A A M Wilde; A Algra; F C Visser; G J E Rinkel Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Eric S Rosenthal; Siddharth Biswal; Sahar F Zafar; Kathryn L O'Connor; Sophia Bechek; Apeksha V Shenoy; Emily J Boyle; Mouhsin M Shafi; Emily J Gilmore; Brandon P Foreman; Nicolas Gaspard; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Jonathan Rosand; Daniel B Hoch; Cenk Ayata; Sydney S Cash; Andrew J Cole; Aman B Patel; M Brandon Westover Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jan Claassen; David Albers; J Michael Schmidt; Gian Marco De Marchis; Deborah Pugin; Christina Maria Falo; Stephan A Mayer; Serge Cremers; Sachin Agarwal; Mitchell S V Elkind; E Sander Connolly; Vanja Dukic; George Hripcsak; Neeraj Badjatia Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 10.422