BACKGROUND: An increasing number of childhood cancer survivors need long-term follow-up care. Different models address this problem, including that of follow-up by general practitioners (GP). We describe models that involve GPs in follow-up for childhood cancer survivors, their advantages and disadvantages, clinics that employ these models, and the elements essential to high-quality, GP-led follow-up care. PROCEDURE: We searched four databases (PubMed [including Medline], Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL) without language restrictions. RESULTS: We found 26 publications, which explicitly mentioned GP-led follow-up. Two models were commonly described: GP-only, and shared care between GP and pediatric oncology or late effects clinic. The shared care model appears to have advantages over GP-only follow-up. We found four clinics using models of GP-led follow-up, described in five papers. We identified well-organized transition, treatment summary, survivorship care plan, education of GPs and guidelines as necessary components of successful follow-up. CONCLUSION: Scarcity of literature necessitated a review rather than a meta-analysis. More research on the outcomes of GP-led care is necessary to confirm the model for follow-up of childhood cancer survivors in the long term. However, with the necessary elements in place, the model of GP-led follow-up, and shared care in particular, holds promise.
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of childhood cancer survivors need long-term follow-up care. Different models address this problem, including that of follow-up by general practitioners (GP). We describe models that involve GPs in follow-up for childhood cancer survivors, their advantages and disadvantages, clinics that employ these models, and the elements essential to high-quality, GP-led follow-up care. PROCEDURE: We searched four databases (PubMed [including Medline], Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL) without language restrictions. RESULTS: We found 26 publications, which explicitly mentioned GP-led follow-up. Two models were commonly described: GP-only, and shared care between GP and pediatric oncology or late effects clinic. The shared care model appears to have advantages over GP-only follow-up. We found four clinics using models of GP-led follow-up, described in five papers. We identified well-organized transition, treatment summary, survivorship care plan, education of GPs and guidelines as necessary components of successful follow-up. CONCLUSION: Scarcity of literature necessitated a review rather than a meta-analysis. More research on the outcomes of GP-led care is necessary to confirm the model for follow-up of childhood cancer survivors in the long term. However, with the necessary elements in place, the model of GP-led follow-up, and shared care in particular, holds promise.
Authors: Gisela Michel; Renée L Mulder; Helena J H van der Pal; Roderick Skinner; Edit Bárdi; Morven C Brown; Janine Vetsch; Eva Frey; Rachael Windsor; Leontien C M Kremer; Gill Levitt Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Maria Otth; Sibylle Denzler; Christa Koenig; Henrik Koehler; Katrin Scheinemann Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Emily S Tonorezos; Dana Barnea; Richard J Cohn; Monica S Cypriano; Brice C Fresneau; Riccardo Haupt; Lars Hjorth; Yasushi Ishida; Jarmila Kruseova; Claudia E Kuehni; Purna A Kurkure; Thorsten Langer; Paul C Nathan; Jane E Skeen; Roderick Skinner; Nurdan Tacyildiz; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Jeanette F Winther; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hanne C Lie; Anneli V Mellblom; Mette Brekke; Arnstein Finset; Sophie D Fosså; Cecilie E Kiserud; Ellen Ruud; Jon H Loge Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Melanie R Keats; Kelsey Shea; Louise Parker; Samuel A Stewart; Annette Flanders; Mark Bernstein Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.037