Literature DB >> 23813540

Appropriateness of commercially available and partially customized medication dosing alerts among pediatric patients.

Jeremy S Stultz1, Milap C Nahata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate dosing alert appropriateness, categorize orders with alerts, and compare the appropriateness of alerts due to customized and non-customized dose ranges at a pediatric hospital.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of medication orders causing dosing alerts. Orders for outpatient prescriptions, patients ≥18 years of age, and research protocols were excluded. Patient medical records were reviewed and ordered doses compared with a widely used pediatric reference (Lexi-Comp) and institutional recommendations. The alerted orders were categorized and the occurrence of appropriate alerts was compared.
RESULTS: There were 47 181 inpatient orders during the studied period; 1935 orders caused 3774 dosing alerts for 369 medications in 573 patients (median age 6.1 years). All alerted orders had an alert overridden by the prescriber. The majority (86.2%) of alerted orders inappropriately caused alerts; 58.0% were justifiable doses and 28.2% were within Lexi-Comp. However, 13.8% of alerted orders appropriately caused alerts; 8.0% were incorrect doses and 5.8% had no dosing recommendations available. Appropriately alerted orders occurred in 19.7% of alerted orders due to customized ranges compared to 12.8% due to non-customized ranges (p=0.002). Preterm and term neonates, infants, and children (2-5 years) had higher proportions of inappropriate alerts compared to appropriate alerts (all p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of dosing alerts were presented to practitioners inappropriately, potentially contributing to alert fatigue. Appropriate alerts occurred more often when alerts were due to customized ranges. Advances in dosing alerts should aim to provide accurate and clinically relevant alerts that minimize excessive inappropriate alerting. Medications requiring dosing adjustments based on clinical parameters must be taken into account when designing and evaluating dosing alerts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administration and dosage; Clinical decision support system; Medical order entry systems; Medication errors; Pediatrics; Prescriptions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813540      PMCID: PMC3957387          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  23 in total

1.  Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Brian L Strom; Rita Schinnar; Faten Aberra; Warren Bilker; Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Eric Pifer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-27

2.  The impact of hospitalwide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Upperman; Patricia Staley; Kerri Friend; William Neches; David Kazimer; Jocelyn Benes; Eugene S Wiener
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  To what extent do pediatricians accept computer-based dosing suggestions?

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Rainu Kaushal; Mary Cooper; Gilad J Kuperman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Alert fatigue.

Authors:  Jared J Cash
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Evaluation of contraindicated drug-drug interaction alerts in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Randy C Hatton; Amy F Rosenberg; Candice T Morris; Russell P McKelvey; James R Lewis
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Fatal hyperphosphatemia after oral phosphate overdose in a premature infant.

Authors:  J M Perlman
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Tiering drug-drug interaction alerts by severity increases compliance rates.

Authors:  Marilyn D Paterno; Saverio M Maviglia; Paul N Gorman; Diane L Seger; Eileen Yoshida; Andrew C Seger; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Frequency and preventability of adverse drug reactions in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Mary E Temple; Renee F Robinson; Julie C Miller; John R Hayes; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Effect of computer order entry on prevention of serious medication errors in hospitalized children.

Authors:  Kathleen E Walsh; Christopher P Landrigan; William G Adams; Robert J Vinci; John B Chessare; Maureen R Cooper; Pamela M Hebert; Elisabeth G Schainker; Thomas J McLaughlin; Howard Bauchner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ensuring safe and effective medication use in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Milap C Nahata
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01

2.  Preventability of Voluntarily Reported or Trigger Tool-Identified Medication Errors in a Pediatric Institution by Information Technology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeremy S Stultz; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Appropriateness of Alerts and Physicians' Responses With a Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support System: Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Hyunjung Park; Won Chul Cha; Minjung Kathy Chae; Woohyeon Jeong; Jaeyong Yu; Weon Jung; Hansol Chang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-10-04

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of dosing alerts for dosing errors among hospitalized pediatric patients.

Authors:  Jeremy S Stultz; Kyle Porter; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Default options in the ICU: widely used but insufficiently understood.

Authors:  Joanna Hart; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.687

6.  Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Alison Edwards; Sarah Nosal; Diane Hauser; Elizabeth Mauer; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Quality of Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Delphine Carli; Guillaume Fahrni; Pascal Bonnabry; Christian Lovis
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-01-24

8.  Dosing Recommendations for Pediatric Patients With Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Amer Al-Khouja; Kyunghun Park; Daijha J C Anderson; Caitlyn Young; Jian Wang; Shiew Mei Huang; Mona Khurana; Gilbert J Burckart
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Clinical Validity Assessment of Integrated Dose Range Checking Tool in a Tertiary Care Hospital Using an Electronic Health Information System.

Authors:  Abdulrazaq S Al-Jazairi; Eman K AlQadheeb; Lama K AlShammari; Maha A AlAshaikh; Abdulgader Al-Moeen; Peter Cahusac; Osama Al-Swailem
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-08-06

10.  Positioning a Paediatric Compounded Non-Sterile Product Electronic Repository (pCNPeRx) within the Health Information Technology Infrastructure.

Authors:  Richard H Parrish Ii
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.