BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, ErbB family blocker in clinical development for the treatment of a variety of solid tumours. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of afatinib (10-100 mg once daily) in cancer patients. METHODS: Data from 221 patients with advanced solid tumours in four phase I and one phase II trial were analysed using non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: Within each dose group, the shape of the geometric mean plasma concentration-time profiles after single and multiple doses were comparable. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) values were achieved 2-5 h after dosing and thereafter declined at least bi-exponentially. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained within 8 days after the start of dosing. The geometric mean terminal elimination half-life at steady state was about 37 h. Repeated dosing resulted in a 2.77-fold accumulation based on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), and 2.11-fold accumulation based on C(max) values. A slightly more than dose-proportional increase in afatinib exposure was observed. There was moderate intra-individual variability in afatinib trough concentration values (the geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) ranged from 22.2 to 67.5 %). The inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations was moderate to high (e.g. at the 40 mg dose, the gCVs ranged from 35.6 to 221 %). The exposure to afatinib (as measured by AUC and C(max)) correlated with the severity of the most common adverse events of afatinib--diarrhoea and rash. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib supports a once-daily dosage regimen. As expected for this patient population, the pharmacokinetic parameters of afatinib showed moderate to high inter-patient variability. Afatinib exhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Afatinib is a potent, irreversible, ErbB family blocker in clinical development for the treatment of a variety of solid tumours. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of afatinib (10-100 mg once daily) in cancerpatients. METHODS: Data from 221 patients with advanced solid tumours in four phase I and one phase II trial were analysed using non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: Within each dose group, the shape of the geometric mean plasma concentration-time profiles after single and multiple doses were comparable. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) values were achieved 2-5 h after dosing and thereafter declined at least bi-exponentially. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained within 8 days after the start of dosing. The geometric mean terminal elimination half-life at steady state was about 37 h. Repeated dosing resulted in a 2.77-fold accumulation based on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), and 2.11-fold accumulation based on C(max) values. A slightly more than dose-proportional increase in afatinib exposure was observed. There was moderate intra-individual variability in afatinib trough concentration values (the geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) ranged from 22.2 to 67.5 %). The inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations was moderate to high (e.g. at the 40 mg dose, the gCVs ranged from 35.6 to 221 %). The exposure to afatinib (as measured by AUC and C(max)) correlated with the severity of the most common adverse events of afatinib--diarrhoea and rash. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib supports a once-daily dosage regimen. As expected for this patient population, the pharmacokinetic parameters of afatinib showed moderate to high inter-patient variability. Afatinib exhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics.
Authors: Timothy A Yap; Laura Vidal; Jan Adam; Peter Stephens; James Spicer; Heather Shaw; Jooern Ang; Graham Temple; Susan Bell; Mehdi Shahidi; Martina Uttenreuther-Fischer; Peter Stopfer; Andrew Futreal; Hilary Calvert; Johann S de Bono; Ruth Plummer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Baselga; D Rischin; M Ranson; H Calvert; E Raymond; D G Kieback; S B Kaye; L Gianni; A Harris; T Bjork; S D Averbuch; A Feyereislova; H Swaisland; F Rojo; J Albanell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter Stopfer; Kristell Marzin; Hans Narjes; Dietmar Gansser; Mehdi Shahidi; Martina Uttereuther-Fischer; Thomas Ebner Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Malcolm Ranson; Lisa A Hammond; David Ferry; Mark Kris; Andrew Tullo; Philip I Murray; Vince Miller; Steve Averbuch; Judy Ochs; Charles Morris; Andrea Feyereislova; Helen Swaisland; Eric K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vincent A Miller; Vera Hirsh; Jacques Cadranel; Yuh-Min Chen; Keunchil Park; Sang-We Kim; Caicun Zhou; Wu-Chou Su; Mengzhao Wang; Yan Sun; Dae Seog Heo; Lucio Crino; Eng-Huat Tan; Tsu-Yi Chao; Mehdi Shahidi; Xiuyu Julie Cong; Robert M Lorence; James Chih-Hsin Yang Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Flavio Solca; Goeran Dahl; Andreas Zoephel; Gerd Bader; Michael Sanderson; Christian Klein; Oliver Kraemer; Frank Himmelsbach; Eric Haaksma; Guenther R Adolf Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: A H Awada; H Dumez; A Hendlisz; P Wolter; T Besse-Hammer; M Uttenreuther-Fischer; P Stopfer; F Fleischer; M Piccart; P Schöffski Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Michael S Gordon; David S Mendelson; Mitchell Gross; Martina Uttenreuther-Fischer; Mahmoud Ould-Kaci; Yihua Zhao; Peter Stopfer; David B Agus Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Ariella B Hanker; Monica Red Brewer; Jonathan H Sheehan; James P Koch; Gregory R Sliwoski; Rebecca Nagy; Richard Lanman; Michael F Berger; David M Hyman; David B Solit; Jie He; Vincent Miller; Richard E Cutler; Alshad S Lalani; Darren Cross; Christine M Lovly; Jens Meiler; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Sven Wind; Thomas Giessmann; Arvid Jungnik; Tobias Brand; Kristell Marzin; Julia Bertulis; Julia Hocke; Dietmar Gansser; Peter Stopfer Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Jacqulyne P Robichaux; Yasir Y Elamin; Zhi Tan; Brett W Carter; Shuxing Zhang; Shengwu Liu; Shuai Li; Ting Chen; Alissa Poteete; Adriana Estrada-Bernal; Anh T Le; Anna Truini; Monique B Nilsson; Huiying Sun; Emily Roarty; Sarah B Goldberg; Julie R Brahmer; Mehmet Altan; Charles Lu; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Katerina Politi; Robert C Doebele; Kwok-Kin Wong; John V Heymach Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Nicolas Martin; Nicolas Isambert; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Rainer-Georg Goeldner; Sylvie Zanetta; Behbood Sadrolhefazi; Hélène de Mont-Serrat; Mario Campone; Jean-Pierre Delord Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Quincy S Chu; Randeep Sangha; Sebastien J Hotte; Gwen Sergenson; David Schnell; Vikram K Chand; Hal W Hirte Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-07-19 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Thu H Truong; Peter Man-Un Ung; Prakash B Palde; Candice E Paulsen; Avner Schlessinger; Kate S Carroll Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Jacques Cadranel; Stephen V Liu; Michaël Duruisseaux; Eva Branden; Yasushi Goto; Benjamin A Weinberg; Christoph Heining; Richard F Schlenk; Parneet Cheema; Martin R Jones; Alexander Drilon; Domenico Trombetta; Lucia Anna Muscarella; Khaled Tolba; Valerie Gounant; Agnieszka Cseh; Flavio Solca; Janessa J Laskin; Daniel J Renouf Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-09-23