BACKGROUND: Fixation of cementless orthopaedic implants is not always achieved, particularly in challenging scenarios such as revision surgery, trauma, and tumor reconstruction. An adjunct therapy for improving implant fixation would improve the reliability and durability of certain reconstructive procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of local elution of the bisphosphonate alendronic acid on bone formation around porous titanium implants in an animal model. METHODS: Porous-coated cylindrical rods were coated with either 0.2 mg or 1.0 mg alendronic acid before bilateral surgical implantation into the femoral intramedullary canals of 10 experimental dogs. Twelve weeks after surgery, the femora were harvested and scanned with micro-CT to quantify the percentage volume of bone within the immediate periimplant space. Four femora from two dogs were also processed for undecalcified thin-section histology and analysis with backscattered scanning electron microscopy. Three histologic sections from each of these four femora were anatomically matched with transverse micro-CT sections to enable direct comparison of the area fraction of bone within the periimplant space. RESULTS: Compared with paired controls, micro-CT analysis showed that local elution of alendronic acid increased periimplant bone at both doses of 0.2 mg (+52%, p = 0.01) and 1.0 mg (+152%, p = 0.004) with 1.0 mg resulting in a 2.9-fold greater mean relative increase compared with 0.2 mg (p = 0.002). Micro-CT measurements of periimplant bone formation correlated very strongly with the backscattered scanning electron microscopy measurements (R = 0.965, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Local elution of alendronic acid causes a dose-dependent net increase in periimplant bone formation in an animal model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This concept has potential to improve the biologic fixation of porous reconstructive implants.
BACKGROUND: Fixation of cementless orthopaedic implants is not always achieved, particularly in challenging scenarios such as revision surgery, trauma, and tumor reconstruction. An adjunct therapy for improving implant fixation would improve the reliability and durability of certain reconstructive procedures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of local elution of the bisphosphonatealendronic acid on bone formation around porous titanium implants in an animal model. METHODS: Porous-coated cylindrical rods were coated with either 0.2 mg or 1.0 mg alendronic acid before bilateral surgical implantation into the femoral intramedullary canals of 10 experimental dogs. Twelve weeks after surgery, the femora were harvested and scanned with micro-CT to quantify the percentage volume of bone within the immediate periimplant space. Four femora from two dogs were also processed for undecalcified thin-section histology and analysis with backscattered scanning electron microscopy. Three histologic sections from each of these four femora were anatomically matched with transverse micro-CT sections to enable direct comparison of the area fraction of bone within the periimplant space. RESULTS: Compared with paired controls, micro-CT analysis showed that local elution of alendronic acid increased periimplant bone at both doses of 0.2 mg (+52%, p = 0.01) and 1.0 mg (+152%, p = 0.004) with 1.0 mg resulting in a 2.9-fold greater mean relative increase compared with 0.2 mg (p = 0.002). Micro-CT measurements of periimplant bone formation correlated very strongly with the backscattered scanning electron microscopy measurements (R = 0.965, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Local elution of alendronic acid causes a dose-dependent net increase in periimplant bone formation in an animal model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This concept has potential to improve the biologic fixation of porous reconstructive implants.
Authors: C García-Moreno; S Serrano; M Nacher; M Farré; A Díez; M L Mariñoso; J Carbonell; L Mellibovsky; X Nogués; J Ballester; J Aubía Journal: Bone Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: J Dennis Bobyn; Kimberly McKenzie; Dorota Karabasz; Jan J Krygier; Michael Tanzer Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: B Peter; D P Pioletti; S Laïb; B Bujoli; P Pilet; P Janvier; J Guicheux; P-Y Zambelli; J-M Bouler; O Gauthier Journal: Bone Date: 2004-11-23 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Mohit Bhandari; Sohail Bajammal; Gordon H Guyatt; Lauren Griffith; Jason W Busse; Holger Schünemann; Thomas A Einhorn Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Gerald Friedl; Roman Radl; Christoph Stihsen; Peter Rehak; Reingard Aigner; Reinhard Windhager Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Thomas Jakobsen; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Søballe; Thomas Jensen; Stefan Greiner; Marianne T Vestermark; Jørgen Baas Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Thomas Jakobsen; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Søballe; Thomas Jensen; Marianne T Vestermark; Jørgen Baas Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Claire I A van Houdt; Paulo R Gabbai-Armelin; Paula M Lopez-Perez; Dietmar J O Ulrich; John A Jansen; Ana Claudia M Renno; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 4.379