Literature DB >> 23813171

Assessment of range of motion and contact zones with commonly performed physical exam manoeuvers for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): what do these tests mean?

Asheesh Bedi1, Matthew Thompson, Christiano Uliana, Erin Magennis, Bryan T Kelly.   

Abstract

Recognition of the magnitude and location of mechanical conflicts is critical to reliably and reproducibly improve functional range of motion and outcomes after surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The purpose of this study was to assess the ROM and location of intra-articular and extra-articular mechanical conflict with seven commonly performed physical exam manoeuvers in a cohort of hips with symptomatic FAI. Internal rotation in flexion results in mechanical contact between the anterolateral and anterior femoral head-neck junction with the acetabulum, most commonly at a 1:15 o'clock position. Associated adduction, however, significantly reduces the available internal rotation secondary to contact in the same locations. Straight abduction results in mechanical conflict between the superior femoral head-neck junction and the 12:00 o'clock position of the acetabulum. With external rotation of the hip in various degrees of hip flexion, the potential mechanical impingement is extra-articular between the greater trochanter and ischium or pubic ramus. The zones of proximal femoral and acetabular contact are not intuitive, and may extend significantly more laterally and distally on the femoral head-neck junction than previously appreciated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813171     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  5 in total

1.  In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Clinical tests to determine femoral version category in people with chronic hip joint pain and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Alexandria Uding; Nancy J Bloom; Paul K Commean; Travis J Hillen; Jacqueline D Patterson; John C Clohisy; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Validation of a self-reported Beighton score to assess hypermobility in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Gabriel Hatzung; Aileen Müller; Franco Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Co-diagnoses of spondylolysis and femoroacetabular impingement: a case series of adolescent athletes.

Authors:  Peter J Moley; Caitlin K Gribbin; Elizabeth Vargas; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 5.  Over one third of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement display femoral or acetabular version abnormalities.

Authors:  Zaki Arshad; Henry David Maughan; Karadi Hari Sunil Kumar; Matthew Pettit; Arvind Arora; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.114

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.