Literature DB >> 23813116

Methohexital in total intravenous anesthesia during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Tod B Sloan1, Jacqueline Vasquez, Evalina Burger.   

Abstract

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is usually recommended during spinal surgery when transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) are used to monitor. A shortage of propofol has prompted a search for an alternative sedative-hypnotic agent. We explored the use of methohexital as an alternative. TIVA was provided for two adult patients having spinal surgery using an infusion of methohexital. TcMEPs and somatosensory evoked potentials were acquired to monitor neurological function and electroencephalogram was used to titrate the methohexital dose. Two cases are presented in which the anesthesia and monitoring that was provided were successful. These cases indicate that methohexital can be a suitable alternative to propofol in some patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813116     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9490-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  35 in total

1.  Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  M A Hughes; P S Glass; J R Jacobs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The etomidate debate.

Authors:  Alan E Jones
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Arousal time following intravenous anesthetic agents, methohexital and thiopental: effect of doxapram hydrochloride.

Authors:  B T Po; R L Watson; H R Hansen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1968 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Improvement of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials by etomidate.

Authors:  T B Sloan; A K Ronai; J R Toleikis; A Koht
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Susceptibility of transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials to varying targeted blood levels of dexmedetomidine during spine surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed Mahmoud; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Shelia Salisbury; Todd G Nick; Beverly Schnell; Anthony K Sestokas; Cheryl Wiggins; Paul Samuels; Thomas Kabalin; John McAuliffe
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Magnetic motor evoked potentials during methohexital anesthesia in the dog.

Authors:  H J Boermans; A M Sylvestre
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Pharmacokinetics of methohexitone following intravenous infusion in humans.

Authors:  D D Breimer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  [Total intravenous anesthesia with methohexital-alfentanil or propofol-alfentanil in hypogastric laparotomy. Clinical aspects and the effects of stress reaction].

Authors:  T A Crozier; J E Müller; D Quittkat; M Sydow; W Wuttke; D Kettler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Comparison of propofol with methohexital for outpatient anesthesia.

Authors:  V A Doze; L M Westphal; P F White
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  The effects of dexmedetomidine on myogenic motor evoked potentials in rabbits.

Authors:  Yuri Yamamoto; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Meiko Kakimoto; Satoki Inoue; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.