Literature DB >> 2381311

Differences in propelling efficiency between competitive and triathlon swimmers.

H M Toussaint1.   

Abstract

Two highly trained groups, competitive swimmers (N = 6) and triathletes (N = 5), were compared to evaluate the significance of the propelling efficiency as a performance determining factor in swimming. Using regression equations, the groups were compared at equal power input (1000 W). The groups did not differ in gross efficiency, stroke frequency, and work per stroke. There was a difference in distance per stroke (1.23 m vs 0.92 m) and mean swimming velocity (1.17 m.s-1) vs 0.95 m.s-1). The difference in swimming speed between the two groups can be explained by the fact that the competitive swimmers used a much higher proportion of their power output to overcome drag (49 W vs 35 W). At the same time, the competitive swimmers expended less power in moving water backwards (32 W vs 45 W). This difference in apportionment of the power output was characterized as the propelling efficiency (power used to overcome drag/total power output). Mean (+/- SD) propelling efficiency for the competitive swimmers was 61 +/- 6% but was only 44 +/- 3% for the triathletes. The results suggest that on average the better swimmer distinguishes himself from the poorer one by a greater distance per stroke rather than a higher stroke frequency. It is concluded that triathletes should focus their attention on their swimming technique rather than their ability to do work. The distance per stroke might be a simple criterion to evaluate the improvement in skill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2381311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  30 in total

Review 1.  Specific aspects of contemporary triathlon: implications for physiological analysis and performance.

Authors:  David J Bentley; Grégoire P Millet; Verónica E Vleck; Lars R McNaughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Performance evaluation of swimmers: scientific tools.

Authors:  David J Smith; Stephen R Norris; John M Hogg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Factors affecting swimming economy in children and adults.

Authors:  Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Frank Ingjer; Robert Keig Stallman; James Stray-Gundersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Energy cost and body centre of mass' 3D intracycle velocity variation in swimming.

Authors:  Pedro Figueiredo; Tiago M Barbosa; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ricardo J Fernandes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Energetics of swimming: a historical perspective.

Authors:  P Zamparo; C Capelli; D Pendergast
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  An energy balance of front crawl.

Authors:  P Zamparo; D R Pendergast; J Mollendorf; A Termin; A E Minetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming.

Authors:  H M Toussaint; P J Beek
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Energy cost of swimming of elite long-distance swimmers.

Authors:  P Zamparo; M Bonifazi; M Faina; A Milan; F Sardella; F Schena; C Capelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The critical velocity in swimming.

Authors:  Pietro E di Prampero; Jeanne Dekerle; Carlo Capelli; Paola Zamparo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Strategies for improving performance in long duration events: Olympic distance triathlon.

Authors:  Christophe Hausswirth; Jeanick Brisswalter
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.