Literature DB >> 23813060

Stent thrombosis with second- versus first-generation drug-eluting stents in real-world percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis of 3806 consecutive procedures from a large-volume single-center prospective registry.

Helder Dores1, Luís Raposo, Rui Campante Teles, Carina Machado, Sílvio Leal, Pedro Araújo Gonçalves, Henrique Mesquita Gabriel, Manuel Sousa Almeida, Miguel Mendes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: When compared to their first-generation (1stGEN) counterparts, second-generation (2ndGEN) drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been associated with better clinical outcomes in randomized clinical trials, namely by reducing the rates of stent thrombosis (ST). Our goal was to investigate whether or not the broad use of newer devices would translate into higher safety in a real-world population. For that purpose, we compared the occurrence of definite ST at 12 months between two patient subsets from a large-volume single-center registry, according to the type of DES used. Total mortality was a secondary endpoint. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between January 2003 and December 2010, a total of 3806 patients were submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with only 1stGEN or 2ndGEN DES: 2388 patients (62.7%) were treated with 1stGEN DES only (sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] = 1295 [34.0%]; paclitaxel-eluting stent [PES] = 943 [24.8%]; both stent types were used in 150 patients) and 1418 patients (37.3%) were treated with 2ndGEN DESs only. The total incidence of definite ST (as defined by the Academic Research Consortium) at 12 months was 1.2% (n = 46). After correction for baseline differences between study groups and other variables deemed to influence the occurrence of ST, the use of 1stGEN DES was associated with a significant 2.4-fold increase in the risk of definite ST (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-5.42; P=.039) at 12 months; adjusted risk was higher with PES (hazard ratio [HR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.48-8.70; P=.005) than with SES (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.92-5.65; P=.074). Total mortality (3.7% vs 3.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.81-1.84, P=.348).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in the real-world setting of contemporary PCI, the unrestricted use of newer 2ndGEN DESs translates into an improvement in PCI safety (relative to 1stGEN DESs), with a significantly lower risk of definite ST at 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  6 in total

1.  Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Bhavi Pandya; Sainath Gaddam; Muhammad Raza; Deepak Asti; Nikhil Nalluri; Thomas Vazzana; Ruben Kandov; James Lafferty
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  Comparison of biodegradable and newer generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising of 43,875 patients.

Authors:  Bryan Chong; Rachel Sze Jen Goh; Gwyneth Kong; Nicholas W S Chew; Poay Huan Loh; Faith Ruo En Sim; Chen Han Ng; Xin Yi Vanessa Teo; Jing Xuan Quek; Oliver Lim; Yip Han Chin; Siew-Pang Chan; Mark Y Chan; Huay-Cheem Tan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Biodegradable polymer versus second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  James J Wu; Joshua A H Way; Probal Roy; Andy Yong; Harry Lowe; Leonard Kritharides; David Brieger
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-05

Review 4.  Polymer-free versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  James J Wu; Joshua A H Way; Leonard Kritharides; David Brieger
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-11

5.  Impact of the Balloon Inflation Time and Pattern on the Coronary Stent Expansion.

Authors:  Jarosław Skowroński; Rafał Wolny; Jan Jastrzębski; Paweł Tyczyński; Karol Szlazak; Jerzy Pręgowski; Gary S Mintz; Karolina Liżewska; Wojciech Świeszkowski; Zbigniew Chmielak; Adam Witkowski
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs. durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Paweł Gąsior; Marek Gierlotka; Krzysztof Szczurek-Katanski; Marcin Osuch; Magda Roleder; Michal Hawranek; Mariusz Gasior; Wojciech Wojakowski; Lech Polonski
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.