Literature DB >> 23812954

Posterior wedge resection: a more aesthetic labiaplasty.

Shahrooz Sean Kelishadi1, Joshua Brandon Elston, Arun Jay Rao, John Paul Tutela, Nana N Mizuguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophy of the labia minora is of concern to a subset of adolescents and adult women. The posterior wedge resection is a new labiaplasty technique with an anatomic approach to yield the optimal aesthetic outcome and yet continue the functional achievement of prior techniques.
OBJECTIVE: The authors describe the results of their posterior wedge resection technique in a retrospective series of patients.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 22 consecutive patients who underwent posterior wedge resection labiaplasty between February 2009 and February 2012. Complications and aesthetic outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients in this study was 35 years (median, 33 years). Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 1.5 years. Two minor complications occurred without further sequelae. At follow-up, none of the patients reported any paresthesias, pain, or problems with penetrating vaginal intercourse.
CONCLUSIONS: An increasing number of labiaplasties are being performed for aesthetic and functional concerns. The posterior wedge resection enables the surgeon to perform labiaplasty easily, safely, and effectively, ensuring symmetry and maintenance of the natural pigment, color, and texture of the defining free edge of the labia minora.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body contouring; hypertrophy; labia minora; labiaplasty; posterior wedge resection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812954     DOI: 10.1177/1090820X13494755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  3 in total

Review 1.  Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.

Authors:  Müjde Özer; Indiana Mortimore; Elise P Jansma; Margriet G Mullender
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Cosmetic gynecology-a systematic review and call for standardized outcome measures.

Authors:  Bobby Garcia; Stacey Scheib; Barry Hallner; Nia Thompson; Julie Schiavo; Lisa Peacock
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Joint Report on Terminology for Cosmetic Gynecology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 1.932

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.