Literature DB >> 23812846

Low utilization of extra embryos in donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an ethical dilemma to donor management.

Heather Cook1, Christine Briton-Jones, David Hill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore outcomes of donor In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles with regards to cryopreservation and utilization of extra embryos after fresh transfer.
METHODS: A database search was performed to identify all consecutive fresh donor oocyte cycles from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2010 at a private fertility laboratory. Parameters analyzed included: number of oocytes retrieved, number of patients choosing embryo cryopreservation, number of patients returning for frozen embryo transfer (FET), and pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 1070 fresh oocyte donor cycles were identified. Average number of oocytes retrieved was 16.9 ± 7.9, and average number of embryos transferred was 2.3 ± 0.96. Sixty-six percent of patients cryopreserved excess embryos following fresh transfer, and only 40 % of these patients ultimately returned for FET. Patients who conceived in their fresh cycle were much less likely to return for FET than those who did not (25 % v 65 %, p < 0.001), however chance of conceiving with FET was no different between these two groups (38 % v 38 %, NS).
CONCLUSIONS: An unexpectedly low number of patients undergoing a donor oocyte IVF cycle will ultimately return to utilize extra embryos from their fresh cycle. This is concerning considering the high numbers of oocytes retrieved and the known complications from hyperstimulation, especially in light of the relatively high pregnancy rates associated with donor cycles. This raises concerns not only for donor management, but also raises ethical dilemmas when considering the large numbers of remaining embryos that will never be utilized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812846      PMCID: PMC3790114          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0038-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  8 in total

Review 1.  Repetitive oocyte donation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes.

Authors:  Masashige Kuwayama; Gábor Vajta; Osamu Kato; Stanley P Leibo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Fate of cryopreserved donor embryos.

Authors:  Jaime M Knopman; Sheeva Talebian; Alan S Berkeley; James A Grifo; Nicole Noyes; Frederick Licciardi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research.

Authors:  S Bangsbøll; A Pinborg; C Yding Andersen; A Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Changing the start temperature and cooling rate in a slow-freezing protocol increases human blastocyst viability.

Authors:  David K Gardner; Michelle Lane; John Stevens; William B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The incidence of both serious and minor complications in young women undergoing oocyte donation.

Authors:  Kara N Maxwell; Ina N Cholst; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Disposition of cryopreserved embryos by infertility patients desiring to discontinue storage.

Authors:  Susan Lanzendorf; Valerie Ratts; Sarah Keller; Randall Odem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Attitudes of couples towards the destination of surplus embryos: results among couples with cryopreserved embryos in Switzerland.

Authors:  Meichun Mohler-Kuo; Ueli Zellweger; Aysun Duran; Michael K Hohl; Felix Gutzwiller; Margot Mutsch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 6.918

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.