Literature DB >> 23812486

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 565: Hormone therapy and heart disease.

.   

Abstract

Menopausal hormone therapy should not be used for the primary or secondary prevention of coronary heart disease at the present time. Evidence is insufficient to conclude that long-term estrogen therapy or hormone therapy use improves cardiovascular outcomes. Nevertheless, recent evidence suggests that women in early menopause who are in good cardiovascular health are at low risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and should be considered candidates for the use of estrogen therapy or conjugated equine estrogen plus a progestin for relief of menopausal symptoms. There is some evidence that lends support to the "timing hypothesis," which posits that cardiovascular benefit may be derived when estrogen therapy or hormone therapy is used close to the onset of menopause, but the relationship of duration of therapy to cardiovascular outcomes awaits further study. Clinicians should encourage heart-healthy lifestyles and other strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk in menopausal women. Because some women aged 65 years and older may continue to need systemic hormone therapy for the management of vasomotor symptoms, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends against routine discontinuation of systemic estrogen at age 65 years. As with younger women, use of hormone therapy and estrogen therapy should be individualized based on each woman's risk-benefit ratio and clinical presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812486     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000431053.33593.2d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

Review 1.  Primary and secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease in women.

Authors:  Priya Kohli
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Female-specific factors for IHD: across the reproductive lifespan.

Authors:  Chrisandra Shufelt; Talya Waldman; Erica Wang; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Menopausal hormone therapy trends before versus after 2002: impact of the Women's Health Initiative Study Results.

Authors:  Sybil L Crawford; Carolyn J Crandall; Carol A Derby; Samar R El Khoudary; L Elaine Waetjen; Mary Fischer; Hadine Joffe
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Assessing and Modifying Coronary Artery Disease Risk in Women.

Authors:  Amy Sarma; Nandita S Scott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  Summary of Updated Recommendations for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Leslie Cho; Melinda Davis; Islam Elgendy; Kelly Epps; Kathryn J Lindley; Puja K Mehta; Erin D Michos; Margo Minissian; Carl Pepine; Viola Vaccarino; Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  An Update on Gender Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease Care.

Authors:  Tina Shah; Nicolas Palaskas; Ameera Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  Prescribing of FDA-approved and compounded hormone therapy differs by specialty.

Authors:  Ginger D Constantine; David F Archer; Shelli Graham; Brian A Bernick; Sebastian Mirkin
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  The association of age at menopause and all-cause and cause-specific mortality by race, postmenopausal hormone use, and smoking status.

Authors:  Angela M Malek; Catherine J Vladutiu; Michelle L Meyer; Mary Cushman; Roger Newman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Dawn Kleindorfer; Sindhu Lakkur; Virginia J Howard
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-07-14

Review 9.  Cardiovascular Risk/Benefit Profile of MHT.

Authors:  Paola Villa; Inbal Dona Amar; Maayan Shachor; Clelia Cipolla; Fabio Ingravalle; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 10.  Endocrine Challenges in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Gennaro Martucci; Federico Pappalardo; Harikesh Subramanian; Giulia Ingoglia; Elena Conoscenti; Antonio Arcadipane
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.