Literature DB >> 23812469

Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Danon1, Renuka Sekar, Karien E A Hack, Nicholas M Fisk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of stillbirth in apparently uncomplicated monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies by systematic review and meta-analysis and compare it with that in uncomplicated dichorionic pregnancies. DATA SOURCES: We performed an electronic search (January 1985 to April 2012) of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies detailing gestational-age specific stillbirth rates after 24 weeks of gestation in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies uncomplicated by twin-twin transfusion syndrome, growth restriction, or major anomalies. The rate and risk of stillbirth were calculated in 2-week gestational age blocks and compared in controlled studies with dichorionic pregnancies. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: We evaluated 361 studies to include nine informative studies, four after additional data from the investigators. The rate of stillbirth per 1,000 uncomplicated monochorionic-diamniotic pregnancies at 32-33, 34-35, and 36-37 weeks of gestation was 5.1, 6.8, and 6.2, respectively. The risk of stillbirth per pregnancy at 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation was 1.6%, 1.3% and 0.9%, respectively. Compared with uncomplicated dichorionic pregnancies, the odds ratio for stillbirth per pregnancy at 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestation was 4.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-12.6), 3.7 (CI 1.1-12.0), and 8.5 (CI 1.6-44.7), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies are at substantial risk of stillbirth throughout the third trimester, which is severalfold higher than in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Given the risk of fetal death to the cotwin, these data should inform decisions around timing of delivery in seemingly normal monochorionic twin pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812469     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318292766b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Delivery timing after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew H Chon; Millie R Chang; Hikmat R Chmait; Lisa M Korst; Philippe S Friedlich; Ramen H Chmait
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins.

Authors:  Jennifer L Burgess; Elizabeth R Unal; Paul J Nietert; Roger B Newman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona Cheong-See; Ewoud Schuit; David Arroyo-Manzano; Asma Khalil; Jon Barrett; K S Joseph; Elizabeth Asztalos; Karien Hack; Liesbeth Lewi; Arianne Lim; Sophie Liem; Jane E Norman; John Morrison; C Andrew Combs; Thomas J Garite; Kimberly Maurel; Vicente Serra; Alfredo Perales; Line Rode; Katharina Worda; Anwar Nassar; Mona Aboulghar; Dwight Rouse; Elizabeth Thom; Fionnuala Breathnach; Soichiro Nakayama; Francesca Maria Russo; Julian N Robinson; Jodie M Dodd; Roger B Newman; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Selphee Tang; Ben Willem J Mol; Javier Zamora; Basky Thilaganathan; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-09-06

5.  Early 2nd trimester fetal demise in a monochorionic twin pregnancy: A cautionary tale.

Authors:  Colin A Walsh
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  Twin-twin transfusion syndrome screening and diagnosis in the United States: A triangulation design of patient experiences.

Authors:  Rebecca Fischbein; Lauren Nicholas; Julie Aultman; Kristin Baughman; Lynn Falletta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perinatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancies: Twin vs. Singleton Charts.

Authors:  Veronica Giorgione; Corey Briffa; Carolina Di Fabrizio; Rohan Bhate; Asma Khalil
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Pregnancy and birth characteristics of Aboriginal twins in two Australian states: a data linkage study.

Authors:  Alison J Gibberd; Jessica Tyler; Kathleen Falster; David B Preen; Mark Hanly; Marilyn J Clarke; Bridgette J McNamara; Sandra J Eades; Katrina J Scurrah
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Should singleton birth weight standards be applied to identify small-for-gestational age twins?: analysis of a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dongxin Lin; Jiaming Rao; Dazhi Fan; Zheng Huang; Zixing Zhou; Gengdong Chen; Pengsheng Li; Xiafen Lu; Demei Lu; Huishan Zhang; Caihong Luo; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.