PURPOSE: The block anesthesia of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) is largely used in minor oral surgeries, periodontics and general dentistry. Furthermore, the area of the GPF serves as a donor of soft tissue graft. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the position and characteristics of the GPF in Brazilian patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) providing anatomical information for the greater palatine nerve block anesthesia and indicate site to collect palatal donor tissue. METHODS: Fifty CBCT exams of Brazilian patients with a mean age of 35.8 years (27 male/23 female) were evaluated. All patients had erupted first, second and third upper molars. A total of 100 GPF were evaluated bilaterally. The GPFs were assessed regarding position, diameter and distances to the midline maxillary suture (MMS) and to alveolar ridge (AR). Guidelines were drawn in the CBCT axial image depicting all molar interproximal surfaces, bilaterally. The guidelines were located between first, second and third molar and in the center of the second and third, performing five guidelines in each side. These guidelines and the molars were landmarks to assess the GPF anatomic position. RESULTS: From the 100 GPF analyzed, 92 were located in the third molar region (24 male/22 female). The 92 GPF were distributed as 47 in the left side and 45 in the right side. The average GPF diameter and the distance to both the AR and the MMS were 3.1 mm; 7.9 and 15.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, we concluded that the in Brazilian patients studied, the GPF location was more closely related to third molar. Therefore, whenever the third molar is erupted, it could be used as landmark for successful GPN block anesthesia. Moreover, harvesting palatal mucosa graft around the third molar should be done cautiously to prevent damage to the GPF vascular-nerve complex.
PURPOSE: The block anesthesia of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) is largely used in minor oral surgeries, periodontics and general dentistry. Furthermore, the area of the GPF serves as a donor of soft tissue graft. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the position and characteristics of the GPF in Brazilian patients using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) providing anatomical information for the greater palatine nerve block anesthesia and indicate site to collect palatal donor tissue. METHODS: Fifty CBCT exams of Brazilian patients with a mean age of 35.8 years (27 male/23 female) were evaluated. All patients had erupted first, second and third upper molars. A total of 100 GPF were evaluated bilaterally. The GPFs were assessed regarding position, diameter and distances to the midline maxillary suture (MMS) and to alveolar ridge (AR). Guidelines were drawn in the CBCT axial image depicting all molar interproximal surfaces, bilaterally. The guidelines were located between first, second and third molar and in the center of the second and third, performing five guidelines in each side. These guidelines and the molars were landmarks to assess the GPF anatomic position. RESULTS: From the 100 GPF analyzed, 92 were located in the third molar region (24 male/22 female). The 92 GPF were distributed as 47 in the left side and 45 in the right side. The average GPF diameter and the distance to both the AR and the MMS were 3.1 mm; 7.9 and 15.3 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, we concluded that the in Brazilian patients studied, the GPF location was more closely related to third molar. Therefore, whenever the third molar is erupted, it could be used as landmark for successful GPN block anesthesia. Moreover, harvesting palatal mucosa graft around the third molar should be done cautiously to prevent damage to the GPF vascular-nerve complex.
Authors: D Methathrathip; W Apinhasmit; S Chompoopong; A Lertsirithong; T Ariyawatkul; S Sangvichien Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Joe Iwanaga; Vlad Voin; Allen Ali Nasseh; Junta Kido; Teppei Tsukiyama; Yasuhiko Kamura; Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Christian Fisahn; Fernando Alonso; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: O Rapado-González; J A Suárez-Quintanilla; X L Otero-Cepeda; A Fernández-Alonso; M M Suárez-Cunqueiro Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Iwona M Tomaszewska; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Elizabeth K Kmiotek; Iwona Z Pena; Andrzej Urbanik; Michał Nowakowski; Jerzy A Walocha Journal: J Anat Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Manil C N Fonseka; P V Kalani S Hettiarachchi; Rasika M Jayasinghe; Ruwan D Jayasinghe; C Deepthi Nanayakkara Journal: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Date: 2019-06-25
Authors: Iwona M Tomaszewska; Elizabeth K Kmiotek; Iwona Z Pena; Michał Średniawa; Katarzyna Czyżowska; Robert Chrzan; Michał Nowakowski; Jerzy A Walocha Journal: Anat Sci Int Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 1.741