Literature DB >> 23811700

Imaging of prostate carcinoma.

Eric K Outwater1, Jaime L Montilla-Soler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Imaging of prostate carcinoma is an important adjunct to clinical evaluation and prostate specific antigen measurement for detecting metastases and tumor recurrence. In the past, the ability to assess intraprostatic tumor was limited.
METHODS: Pertinent literature was reviewed to describe the capabilities and limitations of the currently available imaging techniques for assessing prostate carcinoma. Evaluation of primary tumor and metastatic disease by ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine techniques is discussed.
RESULTS: Ultrasonography and MRI have limited usefulness for local staging of prostate cancer because of suboptimal sensitivity and specificity for identifying tumor extent and capsular penetration. Additional MRI techniques such as magnetic resonance-based perfusion imaging, diffusion imaging, and spectroscopy may provide incremental benefit. CT and bone scanning provide an assessment of metastatic disease but are also limited by the poor sensitivity of lymph node size as a criterion for detecting metastases. Novel imaging techniques such as hybrid imaging devices in the form of single-photon emission CT/CT gamma cameras, positron emission tomography/CT cameras, and, in the near future, positron emission tomography/MRI combined with tumor specific imaging radiotracers may have a significant impact on tumor staging and treatment response.
CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional imaging and scintigraphy have an important role in assessing prostate carcinoma metastases and treatment response. Increasingly, the incremental value of primary tumor imaging through MRI is being realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811700     DOI: 10.1177/107327481302000304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Control        ISSN: 1073-2748            Impact factor:   3.302


  9 in total

1.  Pretargeted immunoPET of prostate cancer with an anti-TROP-2 x anti-HSG bispecific antibody in mice with PC3 xenografts.

Authors:  Catharina M van Rij; Cathelijne Frielink; David M Goldenberg; Robert M Sharkey; Gerben M Franssen; Susanne Lütje; William J McBride; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Prognostic Utility of PET in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-01-22

3.  Prospective evaluation of fluciclovine (18F) PET-CT and MRI in detection of recurrent prostate cancer in non-prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  Oladunni Akin-Akintayo; Funmilayo Tade; Pardeep Mittal; Courtney Moreno; Peter T Nieh; Peter Rossi; Dattatraya Patil; Raghuveer Halkar; Baowei Fei; Viraj Master; Ashesh B Jani; Hiroumi Kitajima; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Claudia Ormenisan-Gherasim; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Thermoacoustic contrast of prostate cancer due to heating by very high frequency irradiation.

Authors:  S K Patch; D Hull; M Thomas; S K Griep; K Jacobsohn; W A See
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Prospective Pilot Trial to Evaluate a High Resolution Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ali-Reza Sharif-Afshar; Christopher Nguyen; Tom S Feng; Lucas Payor; Zhaoyang Fan; Rola Saouaf; Debiao Li; Hyung L Kim
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Detection and volume estimation of artificial hematomas in the subcutaneous fatty tissue: comparison of different MR sequences at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Kathrin Ogris; Andreas Petrovic; Sylvia Scheicher; Hanna Sprenger; Martin Urschler; Eva Maria Hassler; Kathrin Yen; Eva Scheurer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  The Utility of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Discriminating Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue.

Authors:  Elżbieta Luczyńska; Sylwia Heinze-Paluchowska; Agnieszka Domalik; Anna Cwierz; Hanna Kasperkiewicz; Paweł Blecharz; Barbara Jereczek-Fossa
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-02

8.  Genes involved in prostate cancer progression determine MRI visibility.

Authors:  Ping Li; Sungyong You; Christopher Nguyen; Yanping Wang; Jayoung Kim; Deepika Sirohi; Asha Ziembiec; Daniel Luthringer; Shih-Chieh Lin; Timothy Daskivich; Jonathan Wu; Michael R Freeman; Rola Saouaf; Debiao Li; Hyung L Kim
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  GRP receptor imaging of prostate cancer using [(99m)Tc]Demobesin 4: a first-in-man study.

Authors:  Stephen J Mather; Berthold A Nock; Theodosia Maina; Vickie Gibson; David Ellison; Iain Murray; Ravin Sobnack; Steve Colebrook; Susan Wan; Gavin Halberrt; Teresa Szysko; Thomas Powles; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.488

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.