Literature DB >> 23811514

Indigenous microbiota and habitat influence Escherichia coli survival more than sunlight in simulated aquatic environments.

Asja Korajkic1, Pauline Wanjugi, Valerie J Harwood.   

Abstract

The reported fate of Escherichia coli in the environment ranges from extended persistence to rapid decline. Incomplete understanding of factors that influence survival hinders risk assessment and modeling of the fate of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and pathogens. FIB persistence in subtropical aquatic environments was explored in outdoor mesocosms inoculated with five E. coli strains. The manipulated environmental factors were (i) presence or absence of indigenous microbiota (attained by natural, disinfected, and cycloheximide treatments), (ii) freshwater versus seawater, and (iii) water column versus sediment matrices. When indigenous microbes were removed (disinfected), E. coli concentrations decreased little despite exposure to sunlight. Conversely, under conditions that included the indigenous microbiota (natural), significantly greater declines in E. coli occurred regardless of the habitat. The presence of indigenous microbiota and matrix significantly influenced E. coli decline, but their relative importance differed in freshwater versus seawater. Cycloheximide, which inhibits protein synthesis in eukaryotes, significantly diminished the magnitude of E. coli decline in water but not in sediments. The inactivation of protozoa and bacterial competitors (disinfected) caused a greater decline in E. coli than cycloheximide alone in water and sediments. These results indicate that the autochthonous microbiota are an important contributor to the decline of E. coli in fresh and seawater subtropical systems, but their relative contribution is habitat dependent. This work advances our understanding of how interactions with autochthonous microbiota influence the fate of E. coli in aquatic environments and provides the framework for studies of the ecology of enteric pathogens and other allochthonous bacteria in similar environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811514      PMCID: PMC3753954          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01362-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  65 in total

1.  Bacteria removal in septic effluent: influence of biofilm and protozoa.

Authors:  Sylvaine Chabaud; Yves Andres; Abdel Lakel; Pierre Le Cloirec
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Modelling the fate of faecal indicators in a coastal basin.

Authors:  S M Kashefipour; B Lin; R A Falconer
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Inactivation of enterococci and fecal coliforms from sewage and meatworks effluents in seawater chambers.

Authors:  L W Sinton; R J Davies-Colley; R G Bell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sunlight inactivation of fecal bacteriophages and bacteria in sewage-polluted seawater.

Authors:  L W Sinton; R K Finlay; P A Lynch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection.

Authors:  Valerie J Harwood; Audrey D Levine; Troy M Scott; Vasanta Chivukula; Jerzy Lukasik; Samuel R Farrah; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments.

Authors:  Kimberly L Anderson; John E Whitlock; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment.

Authors:  Timothy R Desmarais; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Carol J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Enumeration and speciation of enterococci found in marine and intertidal sediments and coastal water in southern California.

Authors:  D M Ferguson; D F Moore; M A Getrich; M H Zhowandai
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Covariation and photoinactivation of traditional and novel indicator organisms and human viruses at a sewage-impacted marine beach.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Kevan M Yamahara; David C Love; Britt M Peterson; Kristopher McNeill; Kara L Nelson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  20 in total

1.  Protozoan predation is differentially affected by motility of enteric pathogens in water vs. sediments.

Authors:  Pauline Wanjugi; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Influence of Land Use, Nutrients, and Geography on Microbial Communities and Fecal Indicator Abundance at Lake Michigan Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Elizabeth W Alm; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Temporal stability of the microbial community in sewage-polluted seawater exposed to natural sunlight cycles and marine microbiota.

Authors:  Lauren M Sassoubre; Kevan M Yamahara; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Survival strategies of Escherichia coli and Vibrio spp.: contribution of the viable but nonculturable phenotype to their stress-resistance and persistence in adverse environments.

Authors:  M Orruño; V R Kaberdin; I Arana
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Differential decomposition of bacterial and viral fecal indicators in common human pollution types.

Authors:  Pauline Wanjugi; Mano Sivaganesan; Asja Korajkic; Catherine A Kelty; Brian McMinn; Robert Ulrich; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  The Interplay Between Predation, Competition, and Nutrient Levels Influences the Survival of Escherichia coli in Aquatic Environments.

Authors:  P Wanjugi; G A Fox; V J Harwood
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Biotic interactions and sunlight affect persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and microbial source tracking genetic markers in the upper Mississippi river.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Orin C Shanks; Mano Sivaganesan; G Shay Fout; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Temporal Stability of Escherichia coli Concentrations in Waters of Two Irrigation Ponds in Maryland.

Authors:  Yakov Pachepsky; Rachel Kierzewski; Matthew Stocker; Kevin Sellner; Walter Mulbry; Hoonsoo Lee; Moon Kim
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  LA35 Poultry Fecal Marker Persistence Is Correlated with That of Indicators and Pathogens in Environmental Waters.

Authors:  Bina Nayak; Jennifer Weidhaas; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.005

10.  Extended persistence of general and cattle-associated fecal indicators in marine and freshwater environment.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Mano Sivaganesan; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.