Literature DB >> 23811040

Temporal stability of conditioned pain modulation in healthy women over four menstrual cycles at the follicular and luteal phases.

Hilary Wilson1, Brendan Carvalho, Michal Granot, Ruth Landau.   

Abstract

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a phenomenon that may be tested with a dynamic quantitative sensory test that assesses the inhibitory aspect of this pain modulatory network. Although CPM has been adopted as a clinical assessment tool in recent years, the stability of the measure has not been determined over long time intervals. The question of stability over time is crucial to our understanding of pain processing, and critical for the use of this tool as a clinical test. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of a CPM paradigm over time in healthy women. The secondary objective was to determine the potential influence of menstrual cycle phase on CPM. CPM was assessed 8 times in 22 healthy women during the follicular and luteal phases of 4 different cycles. The CPM effect was evidenced by a reduction in the pain rating of a test stimulus (6.3 ± 0.2) with the introduction of a conditioning stimulus (5.0 ± 0.3; P < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the CPM effect was modest (0.39; CI = 0.23-0.59), suggesting that there is significant variation in CPM over long time intervals. CPM did not vary across phases in the menstrual cycle. Prior to the adoption of CPM as a clinical tool to predict individual risk and aid diagnosis, additional research is needed to establish the measurement properties of CPM paradigms and evaluate factors that influence CPM effects.
Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned pain modulation; Descending inhibition; Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls; Endogenous analgesia; Pain

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811040     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  9 in total

1.  Is the conditioned pain modulation paradigm reliable? A test-retest assessment using the nociceptive withdrawal reflex.

Authors:  José A Biurrun Manresa; Raphael Fritsche; Pascal H Vuilleumier; Carmen Oehler; Carsten D Mørch; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ole K Andersen; Michele Curatolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Conditioned pain modulation is minimally influenced by cognitive evaluation or imagery of the conditioning stimulus.

Authors:  Mario Bernaba; Kevin A Johnson; Jiang-Ti Kong; Sean Mackey
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing.

Authors:  Ian G Mackey; Eric A Dixon; Kevin Johnson; Jiang-Ti Kong
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  The effect of Nigella sativa on inflammation-induced myocardial fibrosis in male rats.

Authors:  Fatemeh Norouzi; Azam Abareshi; Fereshteh Asgharzadeh; Farimah Beheshti; Mahmoud Hosseini; Mehdi Farzadnia; Majid Khazaei
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-02

5.  Pain Across the Menstrual Cycle: Considerations of Hydration.

Authors:  Beverly Tan; Michael Philipp; Stephen Hill; Ahmad Munir Che Muhamed; Toby Mündel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.

Authors:  Julia Gehling; Tina Mainka; Jan Vollert; Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn; Christoph Maier; Elena K Enax-Krumova
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  A tonic heat test stimulus yields a larger and more reliable conditioned pain modulation effect compared to a phasic heat test stimulus.

Authors:  Marie Udnesseter Lie; Dagfinn Matre; Per Hansson; Audun Stubhaug; John-Anker Zwart; Kristian Bernhard Nilsen
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-11-15

8.  Evoked potentials after painful cutaneous electrical stimulation depict pain relief during a conditioned pain modulation.

Authors:  Oliver Höffken; Özüm S Özgül; Elena K Enax-Krumova; Martin Tegenthoff; Christoph Maier
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 9.  Reliability of conditioned pain modulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Donna L Kennedy; Harriet I Kemp; Deborah Ridout; David Yarnitsky; Andrew S C Rice
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.