BACKGROUND: Higher numbers of registered nurses (RNs) per patient have been associated with improved patient outcomes in acute-care facilities. Variation in and associations of patient care staffing levels and hemodialysis facility characteristics have not been examined previously. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Poisson regression to examine associations between patient care staffing levels and hemodialysis facility characteristics. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 4,800 US hemodialysis facilities in the 2009 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) End-Stage Renal Disease Annual Facility Survey (CMS-2744 form). PREDICTORS: Facility characteristics, including profit status, freestanding status, chain affiliation, and geographic region, adjusted for facility size, capacity, functional type, and urbanicity. OUTCOMES: Patient care staffing levels, including ratios of RNs, licensed practical nurses (LPNs), patient care technicians (PCTs), composite staff (RN + LPN + PCT), social workers, and dietitians to in-center hemodialysis patients. RESULTS: After adjusting for background facility characteristics, ratios of RNs and LPNs to patients were 35% (P < 0.001) and 42% (P < 0.001) lower, respectively, but the PCT to patient ratio was 16% (P < 0.001) higher in for-profit than nonprofit facilities (rate ratios of 0.65 [95% CI, 0.63-0.68], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.51-0.65], and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.12-1.19], respectively). Regionally, compared to the Northeast, the adjusted RN to patient ratio was 14% (P < 0.001) lower in the Midwest, 25% (P < 0.001) lower in the South, and 18% (P < 0.001) lower in the West. Even after additional adjustments, the large for-profit chains had significantly lower RN and LPN to patient ratios than the largest nonprofit chain, but a significantly higher PCT to patient ratio. Overall composite staffing levels also were lower in for-profit and chain-affiliated facilities. The patterns hold when hospital-based units were excluded. LIMITATIONS: Nursing hours were not available. Two part-time staff were counted as one full-time equivalent, which may not always be accurate. CONCLUSIONS: The significant variation in patient care staffing levels and its associations with facility characteristics warrants inclusion in future large-scale hemodialysis outcomes studies. End-stage renal disease networks and hemodialysis facilities should attend to quality assurance and performance improvement initiatives that maximize licensed nurse staffing levels in hemodialysis facilities.
BACKGROUND: Higher numbers of registered nurses (RNs) per patient have been associated with improved patient outcomes in acute-care facilities. Variation in and associations of patient care staffing levels and hemodialysis facility characteristics have not been examined previously. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Poisson regression to examine associations between patient care staffing levels and hemodialysis facility characteristics. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 4,800 US hemodialysis facilities in the 2009 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) End-Stage Renal Disease Annual Facility Survey (CMS-2744 form). PREDICTORS: Facility characteristics, including profit status, freestanding status, chain affiliation, and geographic region, adjusted for facility size, capacity, functional type, and urbanicity. OUTCOMES: Patient care staffing levels, including ratios of RNs, licensed practical nurses (LPNs), patient care technicians (PCTs), composite staff (RN + LPN + PCT), social workers, and dietitians to in-center hemodialysis patients. RESULTS: After adjusting for background facility characteristics, ratios of RNs and LPNs to patients were 35% (P < 0.001) and 42% (P < 0.001) lower, respectively, but the PCT to patient ratio was 16% (P < 0.001) higher in for-profit than nonprofit facilities (rate ratios of 0.65 [95% CI, 0.63-0.68], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.51-0.65], and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.12-1.19], respectively). Regionally, compared to the Northeast, the adjusted RN to patient ratio was 14% (P < 0.001) lower in the Midwest, 25% (P < 0.001) lower in the South, and 18% (P < 0.001) lower in the West. Even after additional adjustments, the large for-profit chains had significantly lower RN and LPN to patient ratios than the largest nonprofit chain, but a significantly higher PCT to patient ratio. Overall composite staffing levels also were lower in for-profit and chain-affiliated facilities. The patterns hold when hospital-based units were excluded. LIMITATIONS: Nursing hours were not available. Two part-time staff were counted as one full-time equivalent, which may not always be accurate. CONCLUSIONS: The significant variation in patient care staffing levels and its associations with facility characteristics warrants inclusion in future large-scale hemodialysis outcomes studies. End-stage renal disease networks and hemodialysis facilities should attend to quality assurance and performance improvement initiatives that maximize licensed nurse staffing levels in hemodialysis facilities.
Authors: Evelyn K Mentari; Peter B DeOreo; Andrew S O'Connor; Thomas E Love; Edmond S Ricanati; Ashwini R Sehgal Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Elani Streja; Csaba P Kovesdy; Miklos Z Molnar; Keith C Norris; Sander Greenland; Allen R Nissenson; Joel D Kopple; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Jeffrey C Fink; Steven A Blahut; Andrew E Briglia; James F Gardner; Paul D Light Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Kraig S Kinchen; John Sadler; Nancy Fink; Ronald Brookmeyer; Michael J Klag; Andrew S Levey; Neil R Powe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-09-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Hua Hao; Brendan P Lovasik; Stephen O Pastan; Howard H Chang; Ritam Chowdhury; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Kevin F Erickson; Yuanchao Zheng; Vivian Ho; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Jay Bhattacharya; Glenn M Chertow Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jason P Estes; Yanjun Chen; Damla Şentürk; Connie M Rhee; Esra Kürüm; Amy S You; Elani Streja; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Danh V Nguyen Journal: Stat Med Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Amy D Waterman; Marie Morgievich; David J Cohen; Zeeshan Butt; Harini A Chakkera; Carrie Lindower; Rebecca E Hays; Janet M Hiller; Krista L Lentine; Arthur J Matas; Emilio D Poggio; Michael A Rees; James R Rodrigue; Dianne LaPointe Rudow Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Elani Streja; Csaba Pal Kovesdy; Melissa Soohoo; Yoshitsugu Obi; Connie M Rhee; Christina Park; Joline L T Chen; Tracy Nakata; Danh V Nguyen; Alpesh N Amin; Steven J Jacobsen; John J Sim; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Laura C Plantinga; Sudeshna Paul; Jennifer Gander; Jenna Krisher; Leighann Sauls; Eric M Gibney; Laura Mulloy; Stephen O Pastan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 56.272