Literature DB >> 23810441

Intermediate-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Sey Kiat Lim1, Tae-Young Shin, Kwang Hyun Kim, Byung Ha Chung, Sung Joon Hong, Young Deuk Choi, Koon Ho Rha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intermediate-term oncological outcomes after (RAL-NU) for UUT-UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2007 and December 2010, 32 patients with UUT-UC underwent RAL-NU. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 66.5 years. Final pathological stage was pathologic stage Ta (pTa) in 12.5% (n = 4) of patients, pT1 in 28.1% (n = 9), pT2 in 18.8% (n = 6), pT3 in 40.6% (n = 13), and pT4 in 0%. High-grade lesions were present in 81.2% (n = 26) of patients and multifocal disease was present in 25.0% (n = 8). Positive surgical margins occurred in 1 patient. Median follow-up was 45.5 months (range, 24-65). At 2 and 5 years, overall survival was 81.3% and 60.9%; cancer-specific survival was 87.3% and 75.8%, and nonurothelial recurrence-free survival was 71.5% and 68.1%, respectively. On univariate analysis, female sex, positive surgical margins, and pathological tumor stage pT2 and higher are associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (P = .035 and .011, respectively). On multivariate analysis, only female sex and pathological stage pT2 or higher were significant factors (P = .020 and .049, respectively). No factors were found to affect cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this represents the largest and longest follow-up after RAL-NU to date. Intermediate-term oncological outcomes seem comparable with those of open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. We recommend further larger studies with longer follow-up periods to further define the role of RAL-NU in the treatment of UUT-UC.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncological outcomes; Overall survival; Recurrence; TCC ureter; Transitional cell

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810441     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial cancer: A population-based assessment of costs and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Vincent Trudeau; Giorgio Gandaglia; Jonas Shiffmann; Ioana Popa; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Emma Mullen; Kamran Ahmed; Ben Challacombe
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

3.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic bladder cuff excision via the same hand port as that used for nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Geehyun Song; Kyung-Sik Han; Sang Hoon Song; Myung-Soo Choo; Hanjong Ahn; Bumsik Hong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Xin Ling Teo; Sey Kiat Lim
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-04

5.  Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: the Taiwan Robot Urological Surgery Team (TRUST) experience.

Authors:  Chen-Kuang Yang; Shiu-Dong Chung; Shun-Fa Hung; Wei-Che Wu; Yen-Chuan Ou; Chao-Yuan Huang; Yeong-Shiau Pu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Oncologic outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Authors:  Alexander P Kenigsberg; Xiaosong Meng; Rashed Ghandour; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.