Literature DB >> 23810356

Differential effects of cardiovascular and resistance exercise on functional mobility in individuals with advanced cancer: a randomized trial.

Amy J Litterini1, Vickie K Fieler, James T Cavanaugh, Jeannette Q Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of resistance and cardiovascular exercise on functional mobility in individuals with advanced cancer.
DESIGN: Prospective, 2-group pretest-posttest pilot study with randomization to either resistance or cardiovascular exercise mode.
SETTING: Comprehensive community cancer center and a hospital-based fitness facility. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of individuals (N=66; 30 men; 36 women; mean age, 62y) with advanced cancer recruited through the cancer center, palliative care service, rehabilitation department, and a local hospice.
INTERVENTIONS: Ten weeks of individualized resistance or cardiovascular exercise, prescribed and monitored by oncology-trained exercise personnel. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional mobility was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); self-reported pain and fatigue were assessed secondarily using visual analog scales. Data were analyzed using a split plot 2×2 analysis of variance (α=.05).
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (78.8%) completed the study: 23 (67.7%) of 34 patients in the resistance arm and 29 (90.6%) of 32 patients in the cardiovascular arm. No participant withdrew because of study adverse events. Ten-week outcomes (n=52) included a significant increase in SPPB total score (P<.001), increase in gait speed (P=.001), and reduction in fatigue (P=.05). Although cardiovascular exercise participants had a modestly greater improvement in SPPB total score than resistance training participants (F1,49=4.21, P=.045), the difference was not confirmed in a subsequent intention-to-treat analysis (N=66).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with advanced cancer appear to benefit from exercise for improving functional mobility. Neither resistance nor cardiovascular exercise appeared to have a strong differential effect on outcome.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI; Exercise; Mobility limitation; QOL; Rehabilitation; SPPB; Short Physical Performance Battery; VAS; confidence interval; quality of life; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810356     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  16 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Home- and Community-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Physical Function Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maria C Swartz; Zakkoyya H Lewis; Elizabeth J Lyons; Kristofer Jennings; Addie Middleton; Rachel R Deer; Demi Arnold; Kaitlin Dresser; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  What are the attitudes and beliefs of oncologists regarding potential cancer rehabilitation in a tertiary cancer center?

Authors:  G J Francis; J B Fu
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2019-10

Review 3.  Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Reginald Heywood; Alexandra L McCarthy; Tina L Skinner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Effects of a 12-Week Multimodal Exercise Intervention Among Older Patients with Advanced Cancer: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Marta K Mikkelsen; Cecilia M Lund; Anders Vinther; Anders Tolver; Julia S Johansen; Inna Chen; Anne-Mette Ragle; Bo Zerahn; Lotte Engell-Noerregaard; Finn O Larsen; Susann Theile; Dorte L Nielsen; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 5.  Clinically Relevant Physical Benefits of Exercise Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Amy A Kirkham; Kelcey A Bland; Sarah Sayyari; Kristin L Campbell; Margot K Davis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Sarcopenia versus cancer cachexia: the muscle wasting continuum in healthy and diseased aging.

Authors:  Alexandra Moreira-Pais; Rita Ferreira; Paula A Oliveira; José A Duarte
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.277

7.  Exercise for cancer cachexia in adults.

Authors:  Antonio Jose Grande; Valter Silva; Larissa Sawaris Neto; João Pedro Teixeira Basmage; Maria S Peccin; Matthew Maddocks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Supervised Physical Rehabilitation in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jangmi Yang; Miyoung Choi; JinA Choi; Minjoo Kang; AeJung Jo; Seung Hyun Chung; Sung Hoon Sim; Yu Jung Kim; Eun Joo Yang; Su Yeon Yu
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Engaging the older cancer patient; Patient Activation through Counseling, Exercise and Mobilization - Pancreatic, Biliary tract and Lung cancer (PACE-Mobil-PBL) - study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marta Kramer Mikkelsen; Cecilia Margareta Lund; Anders Vinther; Anders Tolver; Anne-Mette Ragle; Julia Sidenius Johansen; Inna Chen; Lotte Engell-Noerregaard; Finn Ole Larsen; Bo Zerahn; Dorte Lisbet Nielsen; Mary Jarden
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca R Turner; Liz Steed; Helen Quirk; Rosa U Greasley; John M Saxton; Stephanie Jc Taylor; Derek J Rosario; Mohamed A Thaha; Liam Bourke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.