Literature DB >> 23810176

Modifications, classification, and outcomes of elephant-trunk procedures.

Lars G Svensson1, Gregory D Rushing, Edgardo Sepulveda Valenzuela, Aldo E Rafael, Lillian H Batizy, Eugene H Blackstone, Eric E Roselli, A Marc Gillinov, Joseph F Sabik, Bruce W Lytle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are a variety of modified elephant-trunk methods, including use of endovascular stents. Our objectives were to classify these modifications, compare outcomes between the classic anastomotic site and these alternatives, and investigate time to second-stage elephant-trunk completion.
METHODS: From May 1992 to January 2011, 526 patients underwent a first-stage elephant-trunk procedure and were the subject of analysis.
RESULTS: Distal aortic anastomosis was located before the brachiocephalic artery in 6 patients (1.1%), between brachiocephalic and left common carotid artery (LCCA) in 1 (0.19%), between LCCA and left subclavian artery (LSCA) in 154 (29%), and beyond the LSCA (classic) in 365 (69%). Stroke occurred in 8% (n = 42) overall, 10% (n = 16) in the LCCA-LSCA group, and 6.8% (n = 25) in the classic group. Risk factors were older age and acute dissection. Thirty-day mortality was 7.6% (n = 40) and was similar for LCCA-LSCA (9.7%) and classic sites (6.3%; p = 0.7); risk factors included older age, smaller body surface area, and end-organ dysfunction. Likelihood of death before second-stage elephant trunk at 1, 4, and 8 years after operation was 16%, 22%, and 27%, respectively. The larger the distal aorta, the more likely was second-stage completion (p < 0.0001); when greater than 6 cm, 80% had second-stage completion.
CONCLUSIONS: The elephant-trunk operation is safe for a broad population, including when anastomotic sites are other than beyond the LSCA. Without second-stage completion, patient mortality increases markedly after 4 years.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  26

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810176     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

Review 1.  Protecting the brain and spinal cord in aortic arch surgery.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

2.  Prophylactic stage 1 elephant trunk for moderately dilated descending aorta in patients with predominantly proximal disease.

Authors:  Jay J Idrees; Eric E Roselli; Charles M Wojnarski; Ke Feng; Muhammad Aftab; Douglas R Johnston; Edward G Soltesz; Joseph F Sabik; Lars G Svensson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  "Why is frozen elephant trunk better than classical elephant trunk?"

Authors:  Luca Di Marco; Carlo Mariani; Giacomo Murana; Ciro Amodio; Francesco Campanini; Marianna Berardi; Alessandro Leone; Davide Pacini
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 4.  Is the classical elephant trunk better than the frozen elephant trunk?

Authors:  Marc Schepens; Willem Ranschaert; Wim Vergauwen; Eric Graulus; Marie De Vos
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-02

5.  Aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk-when not to use it.

Authors:  Axel Haverich
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-09

6.  Are We There Yet? Emerging Milestones in Aortic Dissection Care.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  "Extroverted Cuff", a novel modification of the elephant trunk technique for distal anastomosis of ragged descending aorta.

Authors:  Edvin Prifti; Altin Veshti; Fadil Ademaj; Arben Baboci
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 1.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.