Literature DB >> 23810076

Derivation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram and 3-lead vectorcardiogram.

David M Schreck1, Robert D Fishberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The cardiac dipolar field is represented by the measured 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and 3-lead vectorcardiogram (VCG). The objective is to derive the 12-lead ECG and 3-lead VCG from 3 measured leads acquired from only 5 electrodes.
METHODS: This is a retrospective blinded study comparing measured and derived ECG and VCG tracings. A nonlinear optimization model was used to synthesize the derived 12-lead ECG and 3-lead derived VCG from leads I, II, and V2. A total of 367 measured 12-lead electrocardiograms and 3-lead vectorcardiograms of varying morphologies were acquired from archived digital ECG databases. All tracings were interpreted by 2 blinded physician reference standards. The derived vs measured tracings were compared quantitatively using Pearson correlation and root mean square error. Qualitative comparisons were determined by physician percent agreement analysis and adjudication.
RESULTS: The correlations between the measured and derived ECGs and VCGs were high (r=0.867). No clinically significant differences were noted in 98.1% of cases. Electrocardiographic rate, rhythm, segment, axis, and acute myocardial infarction interpretations showed 100% correlation. Root mean square error compared favorably against other synthesis techniques. Overall percent agreements for the various ECG morphologies were noted to be 98.4% to 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The 12-lead ECG and 3-lead VCG can be derived accurately from 3 measured leads with high quantitative and qualitative correlations. These derived tracings can be acquired instantaneously and displayed in real time from a cardiac rhythm monitor. This will allow for immediate, on-demand, convenient, and cost-effective acquisition and analysis of the 12-lead ECG and 3-lead VCG in areas of acute patient care.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23810076     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  6 in total

1.  A novel convolutional neural network for reconstructing surface electrocardiograms from intracardiac electrograms and vice versa.

Authors:  Anton Banta; Romain Cosentino; Mathews M John; Allison Post; Skylar Buchan; Mehdi Razavi; Behnaam Aazhang
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 7.011

2.  The Reconstruction of a 12-Lead Electrocardiogram from a Reduced Lead Set Using a Focus Time-Delay Neural Network.

Authors:  Gerard H Smith; Dawie J Van den Heever; Wayne Swart
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of a new cardiac electrical biomarker for detection of electrocardiogram changes suggestive of acute myocardial ischemic injury.

Authors:  David M Schreck; Robert D Fishberg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Electrode positions, transformation coordinates for ECG reconstruction from S-ICD vectors.

Authors:  David G Wilson; Peter L Cronbach; D Panfilo; Saul E Greenhut; Berthold P Stegemann; John M Morgan
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-02-22

5.  Ultra-short term HRV features as surrogates of short term HRV: a case study on mental stress detection in real life.

Authors:  R Castaldo; L Montesinos; P Melillo; C James; L Pecchia
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Automatic Classification of Myocardial Infarction Using Spline Representation of Single-Lead Derived Vectorcardiography.

Authors:  Yu-Hung Chuang; Chia-Ling Huang; Wen-Whei Chang; Jen-Tzung Chien
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.