Literature DB >> 23809622

Impact of location of epicardial adipose tissue, measured by coronary artery calcium-scoring computed tomography on obstructive coronary artery disease.

Fu-Zong Wu1, Yi-Luan Huang, Yen-Chi Wang, Huey-Shyan Lin, Chien-Shung Chen, Yu-Jen Ju, Kuan-Rau Chiou, Chin-Chang Cheng, Ming-Ting Wu.   

Abstract

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is considered to play a role in the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerosis. However, whether total EAT volume or location-specific EAT thickness may be a better predictor of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is inconclusive. We investigated whether the total volume or location-specific thickness of EAT measured on computed tomography (CT) could be a useful marker of CAD on top of clinical risk factors and Agatston score. Two hundred eight consecutive subjects with clinical suspicion of CAD receiving coronary arterial calcium (CAC)-scoring CT and CT coronary angiography were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: an obstructive CAD group (n = 97) and a nonobstructive CAD group (n = 111). Total EAT volume and EAT thicknesses at different locations were measured on CAC-scoring CT. Left atrioventricular groove (AVG) EAT thickness was the sole EAT measurement that showed association with increasing number of vessels exhibiting ≥50% stenosis (p for trend <0.001). Logistic regression showed that left AVG EAT thickness was the most important EAT predictor of obstructive CAD (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.29, p = 0.006; optimal threshold ≥15 mm, odds ratio 4.62, 95% confidence interval 2.24 to 9.56, p <0.001). Adding left AVG EAT thickness on top of clinical risk factors plus Agatston score improved prediction of obstructive CAD (area under the curve from 0.848 to 0.912, p = 0.002). In conclusion, excessive left AVG EAT adiposity is an important risk factor for obstructive CAD, independent of clinical risk factors and Agatston score. However, further trials are needed in investigation of combined assessment of location-specific EAT thickness and Agatston score on CAC scan as to whether this biomarker could improve CAD risk stratification in the general population.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23809622     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Epicardial fat volume measured on nongated chest CT is a predictor of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Naoki Nakamura; Ryo Itatani; Seitaro Oda; Shinichiro Kusunoki; Hideo Takahashi; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The relation of location-specific epicardial adipose tissue thickness and obstructive coronary artery disease: systemic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Fu-Zong Wu; Kang-Ju Chou; Yi-Luan Huang; Ming-Ting Wu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Influence of increased epicardial adipose tissue volume on 1-year in-stent restenosis in patients who received coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Hua-Wei Zhang; Feng Tian; Jin-Song Chen; Tian-Wen Han; Ya-Hang Tan; Jia Zhou; Tao Zhang; Jing Jing; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence Advancements in the Cardiovascular Imaging of Coronary Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Pedro Covas; Eison De Guzman; Ian Barrows; Andrew J Bradley; Brian G Choi; Joseph M Krepp; Jannet F Lewis; Richard Katz; Cynthia M Tracy; Robert K Zeman; James P Earls; Andrew D Choi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-21

5.  Differential Effects of Bariatric Surgery Versus Exercise on Excessive Visceral Fat Deposits.

Authors:  Fu-Zong Wu; Yi-Luan Huang; Carol C Wu; Yen-Chi Wang; Hsiang-Ju Pan; Chin-Kun Huang; Lee-Ren Yeh; Ming-Ting Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Differential impacts of cardiac and abdominal ectopic fat deposits on cardiometabolic risk stratification.

Authors:  Fu-Zong Wu; Carol C Wu; Pei-Lun Kuo; Ming-Ting Wu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Is echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness increased in patients with coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ansari; Mohsen Mohebati; Farid Poursadegh; Mahdi Foroughian; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2018-09-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.