BACKGROUND: Previous studies have presented compelling data that a 1-month "boot-camp"-style course can be a highly effective mechanism for teaching and developing targeted technical skills. In the current study, we examine whether performance of these targeted skills is improved when residents are trained using directed, student-led (SL) learning methods compared with traditional instructor-led (IL) learning methods. METHODS: Twelve first-year orthopedic residents began their training with a 1-month, intensive skills course. Six residents were taught basic surgical skills using a format that focused on deliberate, SL exploration and practice of the skills under instructor supervision (SL group). The remaining residents were taught the same surgical skills using more traditional IL methods that included complete demonstration of the surgical task by an orthopedic surgeon, followed by an extended period of instruction (IL group). Performance on 4 targeted technical skills (sawing, bone drilling, suturing, and plaster splint application) was tested using an objective, structured assessment of technical skills examination for the 2 groups at the beginning and the end of the skills course. RESULTS: Before the start of the skills course, there were no differences in performance scores between the 2 groups. On completion of the skills course, mean global rating scores for the 4 surgical skills tasks were greater for the SL group compared with the IL group: SL, 3.95 ± 0.1; IL, 3.42 ± 0.1; F(1,10) = 7.66 P < .02. A similar pattern of results was revealed by the checklists scores, with the SL group outperforming the IL group: SL, 94.9 ± 2.1; IL, 86.4 ± 2.1; F(1,10) = 8.512; P < .02. CONCLUSION: Previous work has demonstrated the effectiveness of teaching basic surgical skills through an intensive course at the onset of residency. The present study shows that allowing surgical trainees to take a directed, student-regulated approach to learning basic surgical skills can further improve performance of these skills.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have presented compelling data that a 1-month "boot-camp"-style course can be a highly effective mechanism for teaching and developing targeted technical skills. In the current study, we examine whether performance of these targeted skills is improved when residents are trained using directed, student-led (SL) learning methods compared with traditional instructor-led (IL) learning methods. METHODS: Twelve first-year orthopedic residents began their training with a 1-month, intensive skills course. Six residents were taught basic surgical skills using a format that focused on deliberate, SL exploration and practice of the skills under instructor supervision (SL group). The remaining residents were taught the same surgical skills using more traditional IL methods that included complete demonstration of the surgical task by an orthopedic surgeon, followed by an extended period of instruction (IL group). Performance on 4 targeted technical skills (sawing, bone drilling, suturing, and plaster splint application) was tested using an objective, structured assessment of technical skills examination for the 2 groups at the beginning and the end of the skills course. RESULTS: Before the start of the skills course, there were no differences in performance scores between the 2 groups. On completion of the skills course, mean global rating scores for the 4 surgical skills tasks were greater for the SL group compared with the IL group: SL, 3.95 ± 0.1; IL, 3.42 ± 0.1; F(1,10) = 7.66 P < .02. A similar pattern of results was revealed by the checklists scores, with the SL group outperforming the IL group: SL, 94.9 ± 2.1; IL, 86.4 ± 2.1; F(1,10) = 8.512; P < .02. CONCLUSION: Previous work has demonstrated the effectiveness of teaching basic surgical skills through an intensive course at the onset of residency. The present study shows that allowing surgical trainees to take a directed, student-regulated approach to learning basic surgical skills can further improve performance of these skills.
Authors: Markku T Nousiainen; Sydney A McQueen; Peter Ferguson; Benjamin Alman; William Kraemer; Oleg Safir; Richard Reznick; Ranil Sonnadara Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Scott R Ceresnak; David M Axelrod; Loren D Sacks; Kara S Motonaga; Emily R Johnson; Catherine D Krawczeski Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-02-04 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Matthew G Drake; Nirav G Shah; May Lee; Anna Brady; Geoffrey R Connors; Brendan J Clark; Patricia A Kritek; Jennifer W McCallister; Kristin M Burkart; Isabel Pedraza; Daniel Jamieson; Jennifer L Ingram; Lauren Lynch; Samir S Makani; Jennifer Siegel-Gasiewski; Eileen M Larsson; Edith T Zemanick; Deborah R Liptzin; Ryan Good; Laura E Crotty Alexander Journal: ATS Sch Date: 2020-12-22
Authors: Tess Chase; Divya K Shah; J Preston Parry; Bala Bhagavath; Steven R Lindheim; John C Petrozza; Samantha Pfeifer; Christina Stetter; Allen Kunselman; Stephanie J Estes Journal: F S Rep Date: 2020-09-28