BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) jointly developed a standardized skills curriculum for surgical residents. This program was intended to be affordable, reproducible, reliable, and proficiency-based. Some experts have proposed mandating that all residency programs implement the curriculum. Although general surgery program directors have supported uniformly the use of simulation in training, one third of general surgery residencies have no simulation curricula. Our goal was to identify barriers to the implementation of the ACS/APDS curriculum. METHODS: The ACS/APDS skills curriculum was analyzed on the basis of the ACS website. All materials listed in each module in all 3 phases were tabulated. Supply costs per resident were calculated along with the time requirements for each. RESULTS: The approximate cost per resident for supplies to complete the entire ACS/APDS skills curriculum exceeds $30,000. The initial cost for the development of our surgery learning center was $4.5 million. Capital equipment and instruments were an additional cost. Time to complete the program was 90 h for each resident, with additional time commitments by surgery faculty, simulation center staff, educational development staff, and veterinary staff. Simulation staffing costs were $22,107. CONCLUSION: The ACS/APDS skills curriculum has a substantial resource commitment associated with its implementation. These capital, instrument, and personnel costs present a major challenge to residency programs that want to adopt this program. Faculty participation in the program poses an additional logistic challenge. Last, resident involvement must be scheduled within the 80-h work-week limit, impacting resident availability for their obligations of patient care. Re-examination of the scope and complexity appears warranted, along with development of low-fidelity substitutions for the proposed modules as well as opportunities for resource-sharing.
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) jointly developed a standardized skills curriculum for surgical residents. This program was intended to be affordable, reproducible, reliable, and proficiency-based. Some experts have proposed mandating that all residency programs implement the curriculum. Although general surgery program directors have supported uniformly the use of simulation in training, one third of general surgery residencies have no simulation curricula. Our goal was to identify barriers to the implementation of the ACS/APDS curriculum. METHODS: The ACS/APDS skills curriculum was analyzed on the basis of the ACS website. All materials listed in each module in all 3 phases were tabulated. Supply costs per resident were calculated along with the time requirements for each. RESULTS: The approximate cost per resident for supplies to complete the entire ACS/APDS skills curriculum exceeds $30,000. The initial cost for the development of our surgery learning center was $4.5 million. Capital equipment and instruments were an additional cost. Time to complete the program was 90 h for each resident, with additional time commitments by surgery faculty, simulation center staff, educational development staff, and veterinary staff. Simulation staffing costs were $22,107. CONCLUSION: The ACS/APDS skills curriculum has a substantial resource commitment associated with its implementation. These capital, instrument, and personnel costs present a major challenge to residency programs that want to adopt this program. Faculty participation in the program poses an additional logistic challenge. Last, resident involvement must be scheduled within the 80-h work-week limit, impacting resident availability for their obligations of patient care. Re-examination of the scope and complexity appears warranted, along with development of low-fidelity substitutions for the proposed modules as well as opportunities for resource-sharing.
Authors: Sophia K McKinley; Daniel A Hashimoto; Arian Mansur; Douglas Cassidy; Emil Petrusa; John T Mullen; Roy Phitayakorn; Denise W Gee Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Jaisa Olasky; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Neal E Seymour; J Harvey Magee; Andinet Enquobahrie; Ming C Lin; Rajesh Aggarwal; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao; Suvranu De; Daniel B Jones Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Edward Meinert; Jessie Eerens; Christina Banks; Stephen Maloney; George Rivers; Dragan Ilic; Kieran Walsh; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2021-03-11