| Literature DB >> 23809231 |
Melissa C Southey, Daniel J Park, Tu Nguyen-Dumont, Ian Campbell, Ella Thompson, Alison H Trainer, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jacques Simard, Martine Dumont, Penny Soucy, Mads Thomassen, Lars Jønson, Inge S Pedersen, Thomas Vo Hansen, Heli Nevanlinna, Sofia Khan, Olga Sinilnikova, Sylvie Mazoyer, Fabienne Lesueur, Francesca Damiola, Rita Schmutzler, Alfons Meindl, Eric Hahnen, Michael R Dufault, Tl Chris Chan, Ava Kwong, Rosa Barkardóttir, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Peter Devilee, Florentine Hilbers, Javier Benitez, Anders Kvist, Therese Törngren, Douglas Easton, David Hunter, Sara Lindstrom, Peter Kraft, Wei Zheng, Yu-Tang Gao, Jirong Long, Susan Ramus, Bing-Jian Feng, Jeffrey N Weitzel, Katherine Nathanson, Kenneth Offit, Vijai Joseph, Mark Robson, Kasmintan Schrader, San Wang, Yeong C Kim, Henry Lynch, Carrie Snyder, Sean Tavtigian, Susan Neuhausen, Fergus J Couch, David E Goldgar.
Abstract
Linkage analysis, positional cloning, candidate gene mutation scanning and genome-wide association study approaches have all contributed significantly to our understanding of the underlying genetic architecture of breast cancer. Taken together, these approaches have identified genetic variation that explains approximately 30% of the overall familial risk of breast cancer, implying that more, and likely rarer, genetic susceptibility alleles remain to be discovered.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23809231 PMCID: PMC3706918 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res ISSN: 1465-5411 Impact factor: 6.466