Literature DB >> 23808973

Lymphatic filariasis transmission risk map of India, based on a geo-environmental risk model.

Shanmugavelu Sabesan1, Konuganti Hari Kishan Raju, Swaminathan Subramanian, Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Purushothaman Jambulingam.   

Abstract

The strategy adopted by a global program to interrupt transmission of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is mass drug administration (MDA) using chemotherapy. India also followed this strategy by introducing MDA in the historically known endemic areas. All other areas, which remained unsurveyed, were presumed to be nonendemic and left without any intervention. Therefore, identification of LF transmission risk areas in the entire country has become essential so that they can be targeted for intervention. A geo-environmental risk model (GERM) developed earlier was used to create a filariasis transmission risk map for India. In this model, a Standardized Filariasis Transmission Risk Index (SFTRI, based on geo-environmental risk variables) was used as a predictor of transmission risk. The relationship between SFTRI and endemicity (historically known) of an area was quantified by logistic regression analysis. The quantified relationship was validated by assessing the filarial antigenemia status of children living in the unsurveyed areas through a ground truth study. A significant positive relationship was observed between SFTRI and the endemicity of an area. Overall, the model prediction of filarial endemic status of districts was found to be correct in 92.8% of the total observations. Thus, among the 190 districts hitherto unsurveyed, as many as 113 districts were predicted to be at risk, and the remaining at no risk. The GERM developed on geographic information system (GIS) platform is useful for LF spatial delimitation on a macrogeographic/regional scale. Furthermore, the risk map developed will be useful for the national LF elimination program by identifying areas at risk for intervention and for undertaking surveillance in no-risk areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23808973      PMCID: PMC3777552          DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis        ISSN: 1530-3667            Impact factor:   2.133


  10 in total

Review 1.  Vector-borne parasitic diseases: new trends in data collection and risk assessment.

Authors:  N R Bergquist
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 3.112

Review 2.  The potential of geographical information systems and remote sensing in the epidemiology and control of human helminth infections.

Authors:  S Brooker; E Michael
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.870

3.  Prediction of villages at risk for filariasis transmission in the Nile Delta using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies.

Authors:  A N Hassan; L R Beck; S Dister
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  1998-04

4.  Mapping and estimating the population at risk from lymphatic filariasis in Africa.

Authors:  S W Lindsay; C J Thomas
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.184

5.  Residual spatial correlation between geographically referenced observations: a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach.

Authors:  Heather A Boyd; W Dana Flanders; David G Addiss; Lance A Waller
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  A spatial statistical approach to malaria mapping.

Authors:  I Kleinschmidt; M Bagayoko; G P Clarke; M Craig; D Le Sueur
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Mapping of lymphatic filariasis in India.

Authors:  S Sabesan; M Palaniyandi; P K Das; E Michael
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  2000-09

8.  Environmental factors associated with the distribution of Anopheles gambiae s.s in Ghana; an important vector of lymphatic filariasis and malaria.

Authors:  Dziedzom de Souza; Louise Kelly-Hope; Bernard Lawson; Michael Wilson; Daniel Boakye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Delimitation of lymphatic filariasis transmission risk areas: a geo-environmental approach.

Authors:  Shanmugavelu Sabesan; Hari Kishan K Raju; AdiNarayanan Srividya; Pradeep Kumar Das
Journal:  Filaria J       Date:  2006-11-09

Review 10.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists.

Authors:  Seong Ho Park; Jin Mo Goo; Chan-Hee Jo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Mapping is a prerequisite for elimination of filariasis and effective targeting of filarial 'hot spots'.

Authors:  Gyan Chand; Laxman Singh Kaushal; Narendra Kumar Choudhari; Neeru Singh
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Validation of a Previously Developed Geospatial Model That Predicts the Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in New York State Produce Fields.

Authors:  Daniel Weller; Suvash Shiwakoti; Peter Bergholz; Yrjo Grohn; Martin Wiedmann; Laura K Strawn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Detection of anti-filarial antibody among hydrocele patients living in an endemic area for filariasis.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Singh; Loveleena Agarwal; Krishna Lakhmani; Chandrim Sengupta; Ravinder Pal Singh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

4.  Lymphatic filariasis in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Negar Bizhani; Saeideh Hashemi Hafshejani; Neda Mohammadi; Mehdi Rezaei; Mohammad Bagher Rokni
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Lymphatic filariasis in 2016 in American Samoa: Identifying clustering and hotspots using non-spatial and three spatial analytical methods.

Authors:  Kinley Wangdi; Meru Sheel; Saipale Fuimaono; Patricia M Graves; Colleen L Lau
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-03-28

6.  Mathematical modelling of lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in India: required duration of mass drug administration and post-treatment level of infection indicators.

Authors:  Purushothaman Jambulingam; Swaminathan Subramanian; S J de Vlas; Chellasamy Vinubala; W A Stolk
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Modeling the Parasitic Filariasis Spread by Mosquito in Periodic Environment.

Authors:  Yan Cheng; Xiaoyun Wang; Qiuhui Pan; Mingfeng He
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Spatio-Temporal Risk-Analysis of Cancer Endemicity in Sulthan Bathery Taluk of Wayanad District of Kerala-A Geo-Informatics Approach.

Authors:  Elmy Gory; Rajesh Kumar Sinha; Dola Saha; T R Vinod; N R Crips; Preetam Ashok Gaikwad
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

9.  The global distribution and transmission limits of lymphatic filariasis: past and present.

Authors:  Jorge Cano; Maria P Rebollo; Nick Golding; Rachel L Pullan; Thomas Crellen; Anna Soler; Louise A Kelly-Hope; Steve W Lindsay; Simon I Hay; Moses J Bockarie; Simon J Brooker
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.876

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.