Literature DB >> 23808681

Quality of life, effort and disturbance perceived in noise: a comparison between employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing.

Håkan Hua1, Jan Karlsson, Stephen Widén, Claes Möller, Björn Lyxell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims were to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and hearing handicap between two groups of employees with normal hearing and aided hearing impairment (HI). HRQOL was also compared to a normative population. The second aim was to compare perceived effort (PE) and disturbance after completing a task in office noise between the two study groups.
DESIGN: A Swedish version of the short form-36 (SF-36) and the hearing handicap inventory for adults (HHIA) was used to determine HRQOL and hearing handicap. The Borg-CR 10 scale was used to measure PE and disturbance. STUDY SAMPLE: Hearing impaired (n = 20) and normally hearing (n = 20) participants. The normative sample comprised of 597 matched respondents.
RESULTS: Hearing-impaired employees report relatively good HRQOL in relation to the normative population, but significantly lower physical functioning and higher PE than their normally-hearing peers in noise. Results from the HHIA showed mild self-perceived hearing handicap.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate that physical health status can be negatively affected even at a mild-moderate severity of HI, and that a higher PE is reported from this group when performing a task in noise, despite the regular use of hearing aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23808681     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.803611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Development and psychometric evaluation of a health-related quality of life instrument for individuals with adult-onset hearing loss.

Authors:  Carren J Stika; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Child-Adult Differences in Using Dual-Task Paradigms to Measure Listening Effort.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Lauren M Charles; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Cognitive skills and reading in adults with Usher syndrome type 2.

Authors:  Cecilia Henricson; Björn Lidestam; Björn Lyxell; Claes Möller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-25

5.  Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-10

6.  Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing perceived listening effort in hearing loss: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah E Hughes; Frances L Rapport; Isabelle Boisvert; Catherine M McMahon; Hayley A Hutchings
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Subjective ratings of masker disturbance during the perception of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Lisa Kilman; Adriana A Zekveld; Mathias Hällgren; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.