AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To analyse frail older people's views of quality of care when receiving a comprehensive continuum of care intervention, compared with those of people receiving the usual care (control group). The intervention included early geriatric assessment, case management, interprofessional collaboration, support for relatives and organising of care-planning meetings in older people's own homes. BACKGROUND: Prior studies indicate that tailored/individualised care planning conducted by a case manager/coordinator often led to greater satisfaction with care planning among older people. However, there is no obvious evidence of any effects of continuum of care interventions on older people's views of quality of care. DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. METHODS: Items based on a validated questionnaire were used in face-to-face interviews to assess older people's views of quality of care at three, six and 12 months after baseline. RESULTS:Older people receiving acomprehensive continuum of care intervention perceived higher quality of care on items about care planning (p ≤ 0·005), compared with those receiving the usual care. In addition, they had increased knowledge of whom to contact about care/service, after three and 12 months (p < 0·03). CONCLUSIONS: The study gives evidence of the advantages of a combination of components such as organising care-planning meetings in older people's own homes, case management and interprofessional teamwork. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results have implications for policymakers, managers and professionals in the area of health and social care for older people to meet individual needs of frail older people.
RCT Entities:
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To analyse frail older people's views of quality of care when receiving a comprehensive continuum of care intervention, compared with those of people receiving the usual care (control group). The intervention included early geriatric assessment, case management, interprofessional collaboration, support for relatives and organising of care-planning meetings in older people's own homes. BACKGROUND: Prior studies indicate that tailored/individualised care planning conducted by a case manager/coordinator often led to greater satisfaction with care planning among older people. However, there is no obvious evidence of any effects of continuum of care interventions on older people's views of quality of care. DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. METHODS: Items based on a validated questionnaire were used in face-to-face interviews to assess older people's views of quality of care at three, six and 12 months after baseline. RESULTS: Older people receiving a comprehensive continuum of care intervention perceived higher quality of care on items about care planning (p ≤ 0·005), compared with those receiving the usual care. In addition, they had increased knowledge of whom to contact about care/service, after three and 12 months (p < 0·03). CONCLUSIONS: The study gives evidence of the advantages of a combination of components such as organising care-planning meetings in older people's own homes, case management and interprofessional teamwork. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results have implications for policymakers, managers and professionals in the area of health and social care for older people to meet individual needs of frail older people.
Authors: Donata Kurpas; Holly Gwyther; Katarzyna Szwamel; Rachel L Shaw; Barbara D'Avanzo; Carol A Holland; Maria Magdalena Bujnowska-Fedak Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Kara Schick-Makaroff; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Lena Cuthbertson; Duncan Dixon; S Robin Cohen; Neil Hilliard; Richard Sawatzky Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2021-04-03
Authors: Giannoula Tsakitzidis; Olaf Timmermans; Nadine Callewaert; Veronique Verhoeven; Maja Lopez-Hartmann; Steven Truijen; Herman Meulemans; Paul Van Royen Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 5.120
Authors: Maritt Kirst; Jennifer Im; Tim Burns; G Ross Baker; Jodeme Goldhar; Patricia O'Campo; Anne Wojtak; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 2.038