Literature DB >> 23808467

Prevalence of terminal duct lobular units and frequency of neoplastic involvement of the nipple in mastectomy.

Oleksandr N Kryvenko1, Ji Yoon Yoon, Dhananjay A Chitale, Min W Lee.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Breast cancer treatment has greatly evolved from radical mastectomy to more cosmetically acceptable and less-debilitating surgeries. Nipple-sparing mastectomy is increasingly done for both cancer treatment and risk reduction. The frequency of terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs) and occult neoplastic epithelial proliferation in grossly/clinically unremarkable nipples (GUNs) is not well investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To describe frequency of TDLUs and occult and overt neoplastic nipple involvement.
DESIGN: Nipples from 105 consecutive specimens (90 therapeutic, 15 prophylactic) were studied. Sixty-five nipples were entirely submitted to evaluate frequency of TDLUs; the rest had 1 vertical section submitted.
RESULTS: Terminal duct lobular unit was seen in 17 GUNs (26%). Six had TDLU in the base, 6 had it in the papilla, and 5 in both. Four GUNs showed lobular carcinoma in situ (1), Paget disease (1), and pagetoid extension of underlying malignancy (2). Grossly/clinically abnormal nipples had Paget disease (2), lymphovascular invasion (2), invasive carcinoma (4), and pagetoid extension (5). Involved nipples were closer to tumor (mean, 1.1 versus 3.2 cm, P < .001), had larger underlying tumors (mean, 4.3 versus 2.6 cm, P = .03) and of higher grade (P = .04), and more often had lymph node metastases (91% versus 44%, P = .007). No pathologic abnormalities were found in prophylactic mastectomy nipples.
CONCLUSIONS: Terminal duct lobular units were seen in 26% of nipples. They were frequently seen in the nipple papilla. Occult neoplastic epithelial proliferation was seen in 5% of grossly/clinically unremarkable therapeutic mastectomy nipples. Pagetoid extension was the dominant spread of underlying malignancy. Overall, the nipple was more often involved by larger and higher-grade tumors located closer to the nipple. All prophylactic mastectomies had unremarkable nipples. These findings should be considered while selecting patients for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23808467     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0137-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy.

Authors:  Victorien M T van Verschuer; Marike C Maijers; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Valero; T-A Moo; S Muhsen; E C Zabor; M Stempel; A Pusic; M L Gemignani; M Morrow; V Sacchini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The PreQ-20 TRIAL: A prospective cohort study of the oncologic safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Benigno Acea-Nebril; Alejandra García-Novoa; Lourdes García Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Nipple Preservation in Breast Cancer Associated with Nipple Discharge.

Authors:  Rita Y K Chang; Polly S Y Cheung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Use of preoperative mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI to predict nipple areolar complex involvement in breast cancer.

Authors:  Soyeoun Lim; Gyeongmin Park; Hye-Jeong Choi; Woon Jung Kwon; Byeong Seong Kang; Minseo Bang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.039

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.