Literature DB >> 23807902

Can imaging patterns of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases predict response yttruim-90 radioembolotherapy?

Julia Neperud1, Armeen Mahvash, Naveen Garg, Ravi Murthy, Janio Szklaruk.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the response to treatment in patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases following yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolotherapy, as a function of image patterns at presentation for (90)Y radioembolotherapy.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with hepatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with (90)Y at our institution during a two-year time period. Hepatic metastases were evaluated on a pre-therapy study assessing relative arterial enhancement compared to liver, lesion size, necrosis of the lesion, and associated tumor burden in the liver. We used six response criteria: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) size, World Health Organization (WHO) size, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) necrosis guidelines, Choi size, Choi necrosis and combination of Choi size and necrosis.
RESULTS: About 65 lesions in 17 patients met study criteria and formed the cohort. Statistically significant response was found for lesions < 5 cm vs those ≥ 5 cm with RECIST (P = 0.04), WHO (P = 0.002) and combined Choi criteria (P = 0.02). Hyperenhancing lesions demonstrated greater response only with the Choi size criteria (P = 0.04). Lesions with ≤ 50% necrosis on the pre-scan had statistically significant greater response with the Choi necrosis criteria (P = 0.01). There was no statistical significance for response comparing lesions < 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm or in comparing the degrees of tumor burden.
CONCLUSION: Based on our findings in this study, it is suggested that initial imaging findings, as listed above, are not a good predictor of response to (90)Y radioembolization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Liver; Metastases; Neuroendocrine; Predictor; Response; Yttrium-90 radioembolization

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807902      PMCID: PMC3692962          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i6.241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  20 in total

1.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors:  J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 2.  Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies: part 3: comprehensive literature review and future direction.

Authors:  Riad Salem; Kenneth G Thurston
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Factors predicting response and survival after yttrium-90 radioembolization of unresectable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: a critical appraisal of 48 cases.

Authors:  Akshat Saxena; Terence C Chua; Lourens Bester; Adel Kokandi; David L Morris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Agreement between competing imaging measures of response of hepatocellular carcinoma to yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Authors:  Eugene Duke; Jie Deng; Saad M Ibrahim; Robert J Lewandowski; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Frank H Miller; Laura Kulik; Mary F Mulcahy; Andrew C Larson; Riad Salem; Reed A Omary
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  MRI of carcinoid tumors: spectrum of appearances in the gastrointestinal tract and liver.

Authors:  T R Bader; R C Semelka; V C Chiu; D M Armao; J T Woosley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with yttrium-90 microspheres.

Authors:  Ana L Keppke; Riad Salem; Denise Reddy; Jie Huang; Jianhua Jin; Andrew C Larson; Frank H Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Authors:  Andrea Frilling; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Jun Li; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Ursula Plöckinger
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  90Y Radioembolization for metastatic neuroendocrine liver tumors: preliminary results from a multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Thomas K Rhee; Robert J Lewandowski; David M Liu; Mary F Mulcahy; Gary Takahashi; Paul D Hansen; Al B Benson; Andrew S Kennedy; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Radioembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using resin 90Y-microspheres: early results in 148 patients.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; William A Dezarn; Patrick McNeillie; Doug Coldwell; Charles Nutting; Dennis Carter; Ravi Murthy; Steven Rose; Richard R P Warner; David Liu; Holger Palmedo; Carroll Overton; Bonita Jones; Riad Salem
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Radioembolization with selective internal radiation microspheres for neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Authors:  Julie King; Richard Quinn; Derek M Glenn; Julia Janssen; Denise Tong; Winston Liaw; David L Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radioembolization Versus Bland or Chemoembolization for Liver-Dominant Neuroendocrine Tumors: Is it an Either/Or Question?

Authors:  Jonathan R Strosberg; Ghassan El-Haddad; Taymeyah Al-Toubah; Diane Reidy; Etay Ziv; Armeen Mahvash; Arvind Dasari; Philip Philip; Michael C Soulen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 2.  Liver transarterial embolizations in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Louis de Mestier; Magaly Zappa; Olivia Hentic; Valérie Vilgrain; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Imaging approaches to assess the therapeutic response of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): current perspectives and future trends of an exciting field in development.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Roberto Garcia-Figueiras; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Isabel Sevilla; Alex Teule; Maria Quindos; Enrique Grande; Jaume Capdevila; Javier Aller; Javier Arbizu; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  A Delphic consensus assessment: imaging and biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor disease management.

Authors:  Kjell Oberg; Eric Krenning; Anders Sundin; Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Margot Tesselaar; Valentina Ambrosini; Richard P Baum; Matthew Kulke; Marianne Pavel; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Ignat Drozdov; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Andrea Frilling; Robert Jensen; Klaus Koopmans; Tiny Korse; Dik Kwekkeboom; Helmut Maecke; Giovanni Paganelli; Ramon Salazar; Stefano Severi; Jonathan Strosberg; Vikas Prasad; Aldo Scarpa; Ashley Grossman; Annemeik Walenkamp; Mauro Cives; Irene Virgolini; Andreas Kjaer; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 5.  Decoding the Molecular and Mutational Ambiguities of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Pathobiology.

Authors:  Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin; Lisa Bodei; Ignat Drozdov
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-12

6.  Prognostic Value of the Largest Lesion Size for Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NET Undergoing Salvage PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC.

Authors:  Markus Galler; Julian M M Rogasch; Kai Huang; Henning Jann; Kristina Plehm; Christoph Wetz; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.