Julia Neperud1, Armeen Mahvash, Naveen Garg, Ravi Murthy, Janio Szklaruk. 1. Julia Neperud, Armeen Mahvash, Naveen Garg, Ravi Murthy, Janio Szklaruk, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the response to treatment in patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases following yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolotherapy, as a function of image patterns at presentation for (90)Y radioembolotherapy. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with hepatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with (90)Y at our institution during a two-year time period. Hepatic metastases were evaluated on a pre-therapy study assessing relative arterial enhancement compared to liver, lesion size, necrosis of the lesion, and associated tumor burden in the liver. We used six response criteria: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) size, World Health Organization (WHO) size, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) necrosis guidelines, Choi size, Choi necrosis and combination of Choi size and necrosis. RESULTS: About 65 lesions in 17 patients met study criteria and formed the cohort. Statistically significant response was found for lesions < 5 cm vs those ≥ 5 cm with RECIST (P = 0.04), WHO (P = 0.002) and combined Choi criteria (P = 0.02). Hyperenhancing lesions demonstrated greater response only with the Choi size criteria (P = 0.04). Lesions with ≤ 50% necrosis on the pre-scan had statistically significant greater response with the Choi necrosis criteria (P = 0.01). There was no statistical significance for response comparing lesions < 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm or in comparing the degrees of tumor burden. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings in this study, it is suggested that initial imaging findings, as listed above, are not a good predictor of response to (90)Y radioembolization.
AIM: To evaluate the response to treatment in patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases following yttrium-90 ((90)Y) radioembolotherapy, as a function of image patterns at presentation for (90)Y radioembolotherapy. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with hepatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with (90)Y at our institution during a two-year time period. Hepatic metastases were evaluated on a pre-therapy study assessing relative arterial enhancement compared to liver, lesion size, necrosis of the lesion, and associated tumor burden in the liver. We used six response criteria: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) size, World Health Organization (WHO) size, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) necrosis guidelines, Choi size, Choi necrosis and combination of Choi size and necrosis. RESULTS: About 65 lesions in 17 patients met study criteria and formed the cohort. Statistically significant response was found for lesions < 5 cm vs those ≥ 5 cm with RECIST (P = 0.04), WHO (P = 0.002) and combined Choi criteria (P = 0.02). Hyperenhancing lesions demonstrated greater response only with the Choi size criteria (P = 0.04). Lesions with ≤ 50% necrosis on the pre-scan had statistically significant greater response with the Choi necrosis criteria (P = 0.01). There was no statistical significance for response comparing lesions < 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm or in comparing the degrees of tumor burden. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings in this study, it is suggested that initial imaging findings, as listed above, are not a good predictor of response to (90)Y radioembolization.
Authors: J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Eugene Duke; Jie Deng; Saad M Ibrahim; Robert J Lewandowski; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Frank H Miller; Laura Kulik; Mary F Mulcahy; Andrew C Larson; Riad Salem; Reed A Omary Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2010-02-20 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Ana L Keppke; Riad Salem; Denise Reddy; Jie Huang; Jianhua Jin; Andrew C Larson; Frank H Miller Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Andrea Frilling; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Jun Li; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Ursula Plöckinger Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Thomas K Rhee; Robert J Lewandowski; David M Liu; Mary F Mulcahy; Gary Takahashi; Paul D Hansen; Al B Benson; Andrew S Kennedy; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; William A Dezarn; Patrick McNeillie; Doug Coldwell; Charles Nutting; Dennis Carter; Ravi Murthy; Steven Rose; Richard R P Warner; David Liu; Holger Palmedo; Carroll Overton; Bonita Jones; Riad Salem Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Julie King; Richard Quinn; Derek M Glenn; Julia Janssen; Denise Tong; Winston Liaw; David L Morris Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jonathan R Strosberg; Ghassan El-Haddad; Taymeyah Al-Toubah; Diane Reidy; Etay Ziv; Armeen Mahvash; Arvind Dasari; Philip Philip; Michael C Soulen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Roberto Garcia-Figueiras; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Isabel Sevilla; Alex Teule; Maria Quindos; Enrique Grande; Jaume Capdevila; Javier Aller; Javier Arbizu; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Kjell Oberg; Eric Krenning; Anders Sundin; Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Margot Tesselaar; Valentina Ambrosini; Richard P Baum; Matthew Kulke; Marianne Pavel; Jaroslaw Cwikla; Ignat Drozdov; Massimo Falconi; Nicola Fazio; Andrea Frilling; Robert Jensen; Klaus Koopmans; Tiny Korse; Dik Kwekkeboom; Helmut Maecke; Giovanni Paganelli; Ramon Salazar; Stefano Severi; Jonathan Strosberg; Vikas Prasad; Aldo Scarpa; Ashley Grossman; Annemeik Walenkamp; Mauro Cives; Irene Virgolini; Andreas Kjaer; Irvin M Modlin Journal: Endocr Connect Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.335
Authors: Markus Galler; Julian M M Rogasch; Kai Huang; Henning Jann; Kristina Plehm; Christoph Wetz; Holger Amthauer Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 6.639